Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8954133
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 15, 20262026-06-15T14:14:56+00:00 2026-06-15T14:14:56+00:00

According to Bjarne Stroustrup’s slides from his Going Native 2012 keynote , insertion and

  • 0

According to Bjarne Stroustrup’s slides from his Going Native 2012 keynote, insertion and deletion in a std::list are terribly inefficient on modern hardware:

vector vs list

Vector beats list massively for insertion and deletion

If this is indeed true, what use cases are left for std::list? Shouldn’t it be deprecated then?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-15T14:14:57+00:00Added an answer on June 15, 2026 at 2:14 pm

    Vector and list solve different problems. List provides the guarantee that iterators never become invalidated as you insert and remove other elements. Vector doesn’t make that guarantee.

    It’s not all about performance. So the answer is no. List should not be deprecated.

    Edit

    Beyond this, C++ isn’t designed to work solely on "modern hardware." It is intended to be useful across a much wider range of hardware than that. I’m a programmer in the financial industries and I use C++, but other domains such as embedded devices, programmable controllers, heart-lung machines and myriad others are just as important. The C++ language should not be designed solely with the needs of certain domains and the performance of certain classes of hardware in mind. Just because I might not use a list doesn’t mean it should be deprecated from the language.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

According to Bjarne Stroustrup, references were introduced into C++ to support operator overloading: References
According to Bjarne Stroustrup: if (and only if) you use an initialized member in
Possible Duplicate: When do you prefer using std::list<T> instead of std::vector<T>? I just watched
According to select name from system_privilege_map System has been granted: SELECT ANY TABLE ...and
According to the docs: You should not override init. You are discouraged from overriding
According to w3schools group by needs an aggregate_function(column_name) . SELECT column_name, aggregate_function(column_name) FROM table_name
According to my previous question integration of jsf2.0 and spring 3.1 and hibernate 4.1
According to the C++11 standard, is the following program well-formed and portable C++? int
According to this SO post: How to check the TEMPLATE_DEBUG flag in a django
According to PHP.net manual, pg_pconnect will create a persistent connection, or will return the

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.