Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6108907
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 23, 20262026-05-23T14:20:46+00:00 2026-05-23T14:20:46+00:00

According to c99 standard, we can write the following code and it’s totally legal

  • 0

According to c99 standard, we can write the following code and it’s totally legal

int x;
scanf("%d",&x);
int ar[x];

My question is, if I can allocate an array like this, why would I ever need malloc to allocate variable size arrays again?

Also, could you please explain how does the variable length arrays allocation happens? Deep inside, does it call malloc to allocate the array or what?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-23T14:20:46+00:00Added an answer on May 23, 2026 at 2:20 pm

    Two reasons spring to my mind:

    1. Arrays that live beyond this stack frame.
    2. Arrays that are bigger than the stack.
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Is the following code legal according to C99? ... for(....) { int x =
According to the C++11 standard, is the following program well-formed and portable C++? int
According to the C++0x spec , the following is legal class A { A(int
According to what I have found so far, I can use the following code:
According to PC-lint , the following statement will never be TRUE : if((variable &
According to Javadocs, when I used javax.sound.sampledTargetDataLine 's following method: public void open(AudioFormat format,int
According to Apple , I can combine UINavigationController and UITabBarController using the code, e.g.
According to this question and the documentation of attr_readonly the following should be possible:
Apparently (at least according to gcc -std=c99 ) C99 doesn't support function overloading. The
According to my previous question integration of jsf2.0 and spring 3.1 and hibernate 4.1

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.