Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 276833
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 12, 20262026-05-12T00:58:54+00:00 2026-05-12T00:58:54+00:00

According to http://lipas.uwasa.fi/~ts/info/proctips.html#orrules , you can make basic or rules in .procmailrc with something

  • 0

According to http://lipas.uwasa.fi/~ts/info/proctips.html#orrules , you can make basic “or” rules in .procmailrc with something like:

:0:
* ^From:.*reriksso@([-a-z0-9_]+\.)*helsinki\.fi|\
  ^From:.*era@iki\.fi
${DEFAULT}

Normally, you can make a condition checks the body with a condition like

* B ?? search_body_for_this

However, this overrides the default header/body search area, so I can’t do something like

* B ?? search_body_for_this|\
  ^From:.*example@example\.com

Is there any way I can do “or” rules as conditions that have sub-conditions that search the body and headers separately?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 2 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-12T00:58:54+00:00Added an answer on May 12, 2026 at 12:58 am

    Actually I misinterpreted your question the first time…

    But if I understand you correctly than the solution would be to create two successive rules and using flag E (else if)

    :0 H
    * <header condition>
    <action>
    
    :0 EB
    * <body condition>
    <action>
    

    (Header flag set for documentation to explicitly state the purpose of the rule.)

    Nontheless, my previous answer might contain something new to you so I just leave it be:

    I don’t know about your solution, but you can make OR-Rules by using weights

    :0
    * 1^1 some expression
    * 1^1 some other expression
    /some/destination
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

According to http://www.faqs.org/docs/diveintopython/fileinfo_private.html : Like most languages, Python has the concept of private elements:
According to this http://perldoc.perl.org/UNIVERSAL.html I shouldn't use UNIVERSAL::isa() and should instead use $obj->isa() or
According to this http://www.cplusplus.com/reference/clibrary/csignal/signal.html SIGINT is generally used/cause by the user. How do i
According to google and some other sources (e.g., http://www.enterprisedt.com/publications/oracle/result_set.html ), if I want to
According to http://docs.python.org/dev/library/plistlib.html , plistlib is available to non-Mac platforms only since 2.6, but
According to http://www.storytotell.org/blog/2008/11/14/literal-tables-and-updates-with-joins-in-sql.html the following is valid: SELECT * FROM VALUES ('Lisp', 50, true),
According to http://java.sun.com/products/javamail/javadocs/javax/mail/FetchProfile.html , Message[] msgs = folder.getMessages(); FetchProfile fp = new FetchProfile(); fp.add(FetchProfile.Item.ENVELOPE);
According to http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa916070.aspx (DnsQuery_W), DNS query libraries are available on Windows Mobile / CE
First off, according to http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/x0b5b5bc.aspx , the List.Find method is only listed as throwing
According to this: http://www.codeplex.com/IronPython/Wiki/View.aspx?title=IP20VsCPy25Perf&referringTitle=IronPython%20Performance IronPython (Python for .Net) is faster than regular Python (cPython)

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.