Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7026205
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 28, 20262026-05-28T00:05:12+00:00 2026-05-28T00:05:12+00:00

According to my class notes, you can allocate an array in C++ like int

  • 0

According to my class notes, you can allocate an array in C++ like

int *A = new int[5]

where A is a pointer to the array.

But then you can access the array as A[3]. Why can you do that? Isn’t A a pointer and not the actual array?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-28T00:05:13+00:00Added an answer on May 28, 2026 at 12:05 am

    The indexing operator[] actually defined to work on pointers, not on arrays. A[3] is actually a synonym for *(A+3). It works on arrays as a consequence of the fact that arrays can be implicitly converted to pointers to their first element.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

According to the class ElementType in the API, you can annotate local variables and
According to the PHP manual , a class like this: abstract class Example {}
According to the axe book (2nd edition), we can use to_s as follows. class
I have implemented a Splash Screen according to WiredPrairie unmanaged c++ splasher class. But
I'm trying to use the MoqAutoMocker class that comes with StructureMap and I can't
I have a class like this: public final class Foo { public native int
GenoTipController must produce class according to the enum type. i have 3 class: _Company,_Muayene,_Radyoloji.
According to rule SA1201 in StyleCop elements in class must appear in correct order.
I have a DateTime class and wish to display it according to some format...
According to the documentation of java.util.Pattern , the POSIX character class \p{Graph} ( [:graph:]

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.