Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 776935
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 14, 20262026-05-14T19:31:47+00:00 2026-05-14T19:31:47+00:00

According to Serializable javadoc, readResolve() is intended for replacing an object read from the

  • 0

According to Serializable javadoc, readResolve() is intended for replacing an object read from the stream. But surely (?) you don’t have to replace the object, so is it OK to use it for restoring transient fields and return the original reference, like so:

private Object readResolve() {
    transientField = something;
    return this;
}

as opposed to using readObject():

private void readObject(ObjectInputStream s) {
    s.defaultReadObject();
    transientField = something;
}

Is there any reason to choose one over other, when used to just restore transient fields? Actually I’m leaning toward readResolve() because it needs no parameters and so it could be easily used also when constructing the objects “normally”, in the constructor like:

class MyObject {

    MyObject() {
        readResolve();
    }

    ...
}
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 1 View
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-14T19:31:48+00:00Added an answer on May 14, 2026 at 7:31 pm

    In fact, readResolve has been define to provide you higher control on the way objects are deserialized. As a consequence, you’re left free to do whatever you want (including setting a value for an transient field).

    However, I imagine your transient field is set with a constant value. Elsewhere, it would be the sure sign that something is wrong : either your field is not that transient, either your data model relies on false assumptions.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

No related questions found

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.