Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6807013
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 26, 20262026-05-26T19:46:50+00:00 2026-05-26T19:46:50+00:00

According to the C++ standard, can I be sure that assignment operators for built-in

  • 0

According to the C++ standard, can I be sure that assignment operators for built-in variables return (the original value)?

Or is this implementation dependent (yet simply have most popular compilers implemented this)?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-26T19:46:50+00:00Added an answer on May 26, 2026 at 7:46 pm

    Yes, it is guaranteed:

    5.17 Assignment and compound assignment operators

    The assignment operator (=) and the compound assignment operators all group
    right-to-left. All require a modifiable lvalue as their left operand
    and return an lvalue referring to the left operand.

    This applies to built-in types. With user-defined types it can return anything.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

According to this discussion , the iphone agreement says that it doesn't allow loading
Can you please tell me if such code is correct (according to standard): struct
It appears that according to ISO 14882 2003 (aka the Holy Standard of C++)
According to C++03 Standard (23.1/3) only copy-constructible class objects can be stored in STL
According to the standard, what is the difference in behavior between declaring variables in
According to this SDK guide , unit-testing a Library project can be achieved by
According to the standard, a conversion function has a function-id operator conversion-type-id , which
According to W3C standards, if you have a nillable element with a nil value,
According to what I have found so far, I can use the following code:
According to the answers to this question, I cannot embed a file version in

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.