Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7924941
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 3, 20262026-06-03T18:02:22+00:00 2026-06-03T18:02:22+00:00

According to the documentation on SSLSocket : You may register to receive event notification

  • 0

According to the documentation on SSLSocket:

You may register to receive event notification of handshake
completion.

Why would you not register for this? Does the fact that SSLSocket.startHandshake() succeeds without an SSLException occurring ensure that certificates are trusted? Or do you get some extra level of assurance by waiting for the handshake to complete?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-03T18:02:27+00:00Added an answer on June 3, 2026 at 6:02 pm

    There are 3 conditions to start the handshake on an SSLSocket:

    • calling startHandshake which explicitly begins handshakes, or
    • any attempt to read or write application data on this socket causes an implicit handshake, or
    • a call to getSession tries to set up a session if there is no currently valid session, and an implicit handshake is done.

    Any handshake failure will generate an exception (including when the certificate isn’t trusted):

    If handshaking fails for any reason, the SSLSocket is closed, and no
    futher communications can be done.

    Often, calling startHandshake() explicitly when establishing the connection is unnecessary, since the handshake is initiated when you start reading from the inputstream (or writing to the outputstream). Any failure there would cause an exception and stop the normal control flow. You don’t need to register explicitly to capture the completion of the handshake in those cases: if you can read/write from the streams, it’s done.

    The notification of handshake completion is mostly useful if you’re a server asking for re-negotiation (by calling startHandshake() after some application data has been exchanged). In this case, you may want to wait for that handshake to have completed before proceeding. For example, if the server requests a client-certificate after receiving an HTTP request for a particular path, it may want to wait for the handshake to complete successfully to be able to authorise the client-certificate, before sending the response. This is because startHandshake() doesn’t stop the flow of application data:

    If data has already been sent on the connection, it continues to flow
    during this handshake.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

According to documentation , git update-index --refresh does this: Looks at the current index
I think none subroutine from List::MoreUtils does not act as described. According to documentation,
According to documentation Default implementation does nothing. But... I throw exception from drawRect method
According to the documentation, the decimal.Round method uses a round-to-even algorithm which is not
According to the documentation : An app is a Web application that does something
Update : This works in firefox, but does not work on chrome 6, still
According to the documentation of java.util.Pattern , the POSIX character class \p{Graph} ( [:graph:]
According to the documentation : There is no way to block signals temporarily from
According the Perl documentation on regexes : By default, the "^" character is guaranteed
According to MSDN Documentation for partial classes : Partial methods are implicitly private So

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.