Home/ Questions/Q 7853557
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Asked: 2026-06-02T19:44:05+00:00

According to the Java EE 6 docs JPA 1.0 @OrderBy uses field names vs.

  • 0

According to the Java EE 6 docs JPA 1.0 @OrderBy uses field names vs. JPA 2.0 @OrderColumn uses column names when declaring the annotations. See here:

http://docs.oracle.com/javaee/6/api/javax/persistence/OrderBy.html

http://docs.oracle.com/javaee/6/api/javax/persistence/OrderColumn.html

The former is available since JPA 1.0, the latter was added with JPA 2.0. If you read the docs for a moment it becomes clear that @OrderBy uses fields/properties to specify the order, whereas @OrderColumn takes an SQL/DDL column name.

Why has it been made that way? To me this looks plain inconsistent.

Is there a deeper point why things have been made that way? Is it a JPA 1.0 relic?

Share

Leave an answer

You must login to add an answer.

Need An Account,

1 Answer

  1. Editorial Team

    Try to understand the difference between an ordered list (JPA1, JPA2), and an indexed list (JPA2). One orders the elements by a condition, and the other preserves the position they were inserted at. They fulfil different use-cases. OrderColumn allows specification of a column name for schema generation purposes. OrderBy provides a query mechanism for retrieval purposes. Consequently what the annotations and XML allow input of are different.

    • 0