Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 934829
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 15, 20262026-05-15T21:03:43+00:00 2026-05-15T21:03:43+00:00

According to the Linux manpages, only the following functions are thread cancellation points: pthread_join,

  • 0

According to the Linux manpages, only the following functions are thread cancellation points: pthread_join, pthread_cond_wait, pthread_cond_timedwait, pthread_testcancel, sem_wait, sigwait. In my test program, thread exits on usleep. Thread function:

void* ThreadFunction(void* arg)
{
    int n = 0;

    pthread_setcancelstate(PTHREAD_CANCEL_ENABLE, NULL);
    pthread_setcanceltype(PTHREAD_CANCEL_DEFERRED, NULL);

    for(;;)
    {
        ostringstream s;
        s << "Thread iteration " << n++;
        PrintLine(s.str().c_str());

        usleep(500000);

        PrintLine("Check whether thread canceled...");
        pthread_testcancel();
        PrintLine("Thread is not canceled - continue");
    }

    pthread_exit(NULL);
}

When main function executes pthread_cancel, I expect that last line printed by ThreadFunction is “Check whether thread canceled…”. However, it always prints “Thread iteration …” before exit. This means, usleep is cancellation point. I think that it is correct – any sleep function must be cancellable. But this is not written in documentation.

If usleep line is commented, last thread output line is “Check whether thread canceled…”, as I expect.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-15T21:03:44+00:00Added an answer on May 15, 2026 at 9:03 pm

    The complete list of cancellation points and optional cancellation points is available in the POSIX spec:

    http://opengroup.org/onlinepubs/007908775/xsh/threads.html

    usleep() is a mandatory cancellation point

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.