Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8596035
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 12, 20262026-06-12T00:34:54+00:00 2026-06-12T00:34:54+00:00

According to the MDN page at for each…in loop , this construct is deprecated.

  • 0

According to the MDN page at for each…in loop, this construct is deprecated. Is there an alternative that does exactly the same thing? The for…of loop does not iterate over non-integer (own enumerable) properties. If there isn’t an alternative, why did they deprecate it then?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-12T00:34:55+00:00Added an answer on June 12, 2026 at 12:34 am

    Is there an alternative that does exactly the same thing?

    A for ... in loop in which the first thing you do in the block of code is to copy foo[propertyname] to a variable.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

There is HTML page with contents like this. Documentation at MDN says that childNodes
According to this article I know, that DateTimePicker control does not reflect CurrentUICulture So,
According to this MDN page , the delete keyword Returns false only if the
According To reflector , ExpandoObject Does implemenet IDictionary<string, object> How ever I have this
According to the String.prototype.replace() page on MDN , I should be able to easily
According to the MDN wiki, DOMContentLoaded will fire when page's DOM is ready, [although]
According to this discussion , the iphone agreement says that it doesn't allow loading
According to Wikipedia, on the Comparison of programming languages page, it says that F#
I need help with this two elements properties. According MDN element.scrollHeight this a height
According to Mark's awesome tutorial page, The map function applies a given function that

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.