Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6551623
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 25, 20262026-05-25T12:21:36+00:00 2026-05-25T12:21:36+00:00

According to the ruby-doc: Hashes enumerate their values in the order that the corresponding

  • 0

According to the ruby-doc: “Hashes enumerate their values in the order that the corresponding keys were inserted.”

Does this mean that hashes are indeed ordered like arrays, such that I can count on the indices of my_hash.keys and my_hash.values and my_hash.to_a always lining up?

For example is something like this a good or a bad idea?

my_hash = {"a"=>"alpha", "b"=>"beta", "c"=>"gamma"}

some_letters.each { |letter|
  if my_hash.has_key? letter then
    imp_index = my_hash.keys.find_index
    table.row[r].col[imp_index].value = my_hash.values[imp_index]
  end 
}

so… can I treat the implicit index of an item in the my_hash.keys as an explicit attribute?

edit: also would there be any time saved by caching the .keys and .values arrays before the loop?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-25T12:21:37+00:00Added an answer on May 25, 2026 at 12:21 pm

    Hashes enumerate their values in the order that the corresponding keys were inserted

    Only in Ruby 1.9. In previous version hashes are unordered.

    Does this mean that I can count on the indices of my_hash.keys and my_hash.values and my_hash.to_a always lining up?

    Yes, as long as iterating twice on the same unmodified hash iterates in the same order. (Even if the hash is unordered.)

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

According to this discussion , the iphone agreement says that it doesn't allow loading
According to the answers to this question, I cannot embed a file version in
According to Wikipedia, on the Comparison of programming languages page, it says that F#
According to this article Silverlight 2 Beta 2 supports the DataContractJsonSerializer object. But, when
According to this rubyquiz , external iterators used to be slow, but are now
I have a ruby-on-rails application that wishes to utilise the tumblr gem for adding
According to the Ruby Set class's documentation, == Returns true if two sets are
According to the Ruby on Rails 2.3 Release Notes... if your plugin has an
According to this post , requiring rubygems is an antipattern. require 'rubygems' The argument
According to Charles Nutter , Duby is a static-typed language with Ruby's syntax and

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.