Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6101391
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 23, 20262026-05-23T13:29:41+00:00 2026-05-23T13:29:41+00:00

According to the Section 3.3, Path Component of RFC2396 – Uniform Resource Identifiers ,

  • 0

According to the Section 3.3, Path Component of RFC2396 – Uniform Resource Identifiers,

The path may consist of a sequence of path segments separated by a single slash “/” character. Within a path segment, the characters “/”, “;”, “=”, and “?” are reserved. Each path segment may include a sequence of parameters, indicated by the semicolon “;” character. The parameters are not significant to the parsing of relative references.

However, I have never seen a URL with a query parameters in any segment other than the final one. So, I am not sure if I am reading this correctly.

Is http://www.url.com/segment1?seg1param1=val1/page.html?pageparam1=val2 a valid URL?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-23T13:29:41+00:00Added an answer on May 23, 2026 at 1:29 pm

    What the RFC is referring to is something like this:

    http://www.example.com/foo/bar;param=value/baz.html
    

    That could be interpreted as the path /foo/bar/baz.html with the parameter param=value to the bar segment. No question marks are used.

    Note that RFC 2396 has been obsoleted by RFC 3986, which omits specification of segment-specific parameters in favor of a general note that implementations can (and do) do different things to embed segment-specific parameters:

    Aside from dot-segments in hierarchical paths, a path segment is
    considered opaque by the generic syntax. URI producing applications
    often use the reserved characters allowed in a segment to delimit
    scheme-specific or dereference-handler-specific subcomponents. For
    example, the semicolon (“;”) and equals (“=”) reserved characters are
    often used to delimit parameters and parameter values applicable to
    that segment. The comma (“,”) reserved character is often used for
    similar purposes. For example, one URI producer might use a segment
    such as “name;v=1.1” to indicate a reference to version 1.1 of
    “name”, whereas another might use a segment such as “name,1.1” to
    indicate the same. Parameter types may be defined by scheme-specific
    semantics, but in most cases the syntax of a parameter is specific to
    the implementation of the URI’s dereferencing algorithm.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

According to RFC959: FILE TRANSFER PROTOCOL (FTP) (section 4.1.1): Servers may allow a new
According to the cakebook section on the Auth component , I can implement simple
According to MSDN (Section 11.3.6 of the C# spec ): Within an instance constructor
According to a section in this presumably accurate book , A common use of
According to this section in the Django docs I should use {% blocktrans %}
According to the following section of BOL: How to: Use Source Control with SQL
According to the ECMAScript specification in section 7.8.1 a NullLiteral is defined as follows:
I want the right grey section to be 100% height according to white section,
According to PostgreSQL documentation section: 5.9.6. Caveats Constraint exclusion only works when the query's
The Emacs documentation has a section on character classes . According to the manual,

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.