Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7906259
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 3, 20262026-06-03T10:51:13+00:00 2026-06-03T10:51:13+00:00

According to this link: http://forums.silverlight.net/t/20489.aspx encrypting a XAP file is not possible. However, obfuscating

  • 0

According to this link: http://forums.silverlight.net/t/20489.aspx encrypting a XAP file is not possible. However, obfuscating is, but according to them obfuscation is just a minor abstraction to getting data in a XAP file.

Can anyone, thoroughly, explain why? Is this because a Machine Key is required to encrypt the data efficiently and that Machine Key is Freely available? Or another reason.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-03T10:51:17+00:00Added an answer on June 3, 2026 at 10:51 am

    Because the XAP has to be decrypted to run.

    Let’s say you encrypted your XAP. For a user to be able to run it you will have to provide them the decryption key so they decrypt it. Now they have access to your un-encrypted XAP file.

    So encrypting a XAP would accomplish nothing.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

http://www.hccp.org/java-net-cookie-how-to.html According to this link I was trying to create cookie and send cookie
http://www.frostjedi.com/terra/scripts/demo/jquery02.html According to this link elements can be moved around by doing $('#container1').append($('#container2')). Unfortunately,
I changed ffmpeg.c according following link: http://www.roman10.net/how-to-port-ffmpeg-the-program-to-androidideas-and-thoughts/ He said the change main () to
link http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ee796239%28v=vs.91%29.aspx#Y3078 the code return this.ObjectContext.SalesOrderHeaders.OrderBy(e=>e.SalesOrderID); note have done and checked everything done till
http://www.mapleboutique.com/_blog/maple_blog can someone explain what's going on here? according to this link: http://austinmatzko.com/2007/07/25/internet-explorer-7-float-bug/ –I
Is a link like this valid? http://some.server/some/path#123 According to List of valid characters for
According to MSDN I can have an OnClick for a LinkButton --> http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/system.web.ui.webcontrols.linkbutton.onclick(v=VS.90).aspx However,
According to this link: http://logback.qos.ch/manual/appenders.html (in RollingFileAppender) It seems to me that Logback provides
So according to the link here: http://www.cplusplus.com/reference/algorithm/max_element/ , the max_element function is O(n), apparently
According to the dojo docs, dijit.layout.AccordionPane is deprecated in favor of dijit.layout.ContentPane link: http://api.dojotoolkit.org/jsdoc/1.3.2/dijit.layout.AccordionPane

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.