Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.
Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.
Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
According to this precedence table, the comma operator is left-associative. That is, a, b, c is parsed as (a, b), c. Is that a necessity? Wouldn’t a, (b, c) have the exact same behavior?
Since overloadable
operator,exists, no, it’s not the same behavior.a, (b, c)could call different overloads than(a, b), c.