Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 747589
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 14, 20262026-05-14T14:13:21+00:00 2026-05-14T14:13:21+00:00

According to wikipedia! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ORDBMS IBM’s DB2, Oracle database, and Microsoft SQL Server, make claims

  • 0

According to wikipedia!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ORDBMS

IBM’s DB2, Oracle database, and
Microsoft SQL Server, make claims to
support this technology and do so with
varying degrees of success

So, are these products true “ORDBMS” like PostgreSQL? Or are they a long way from it? Can someone please point me to any link where I can read about the features still to be implemented by these RDBMS to become true ORDBMS!

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-14T14:13:22+00:00Added an answer on May 14, 2026 at 2:13 pm

    Oracle re-branded itself as an ORDBMS with the release of 8.0, which was the version when TYPEs arrived. However it wasn’t a very complete object implementation. There was no inheritance in the first release and it took until 9iR2 – three major releases later – to get user-defined constructors. Even now, with 11g out, encapsulation is not entirely supported: TYPEs cannot have private variables or methods.

    It transpired that very few existing Oracle customers cared much about objects and very few OO programmers were interested in databases. Plus there was a new Next Big Thing: the internet. So when version 8.1 was released Oracle reverted to being a plain RDBMS, albeit an internet-enabled one. Hence the 8i tag (i.e. it had Java Stored Procedures).

    To those of us brought up on SQL the object implementation is a bit clunky and doesn’t offer much with regards to storage. However, TYPEs have been a major addition to the PL/SQL armoury, particularly collections and bulk processing. Inheritance and polymorphism can be useful in some niche scenarios. I presented on this topic at the UKOUG annual conference a few years ago. Find out more.

    Edit

    Oracle still includes all its ORDBMS features in every edition of the database. They are pretty comprehensive (except for that lack of private variables and methods). I don’t know how it compares to PostgreSQL. Oracle’s OR features are covered in Oracle’s online documentation, which you can read here.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I'm working on coloring a map according to the four-color theorem ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Four_color_theorem )
I am new to python and graphics but have programmed before. According to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transformation_matrix#Rotation
According to wiki http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extensible_Messaging_and_Presence_Protocol , xmpp is using http binding (rather an http pooling)
I was reading this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thread_safety Is the following function thread-safe? void foo(int y){ int
According to http://www.storytotell.org/blog/2008/11/14/literal-tables-and-updates-with-joins-in-sql.html the following is valid: SELECT * FROM VALUES ('Lisp', 50, true),
According to Wikipedia, on the Comparison of programming languages page, it says that F#
According to Wikipedia when rounding a negative number, you round the absolute number. So
According to Wikipedia, a monkey patch is: a way to extend or modify the
According to wikipedia : functional programming is a programming paradigm that treats computation as
According to Wikipedia, The height of a tree is the length of the path

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.