Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7018785
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 27, 20262026-05-27T23:05:51+00:00 2026-05-27T23:05:51+00:00

AFAIK, Virtual inheritance solves the diamond problem but what if I use virtual to

  • 0

AFAIK, Virtual inheritance solves the diamond problem but what if I use virtual to simply inherit from base class? Whats the difference with using virtual here?

class A 
{
    /* ... */
};

class B : virtual public A
{
    /* ... */
};
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-27T23:05:51+00:00Added an answer on May 27, 2026 at 11:05 pm

    There are a few differences. The object layout will be different (in the case of virtual inheritance there will be an extra hidden pointer to the base in the derived subobject), initialization of the subobjects will differ (a type deriving from B will have to call the A constructor directly in the initialization list). Any code in B member functions that refers to A members (data or functions) will require an extra indirection (through the pointer mentioned before), and possibly other differences.

    Virtual inheritance is a complex matter and you should probably read more of the links provided in the answers to the previous question of yours than try to understand it by just getting bits and pieces from separate questions.

    Hint: If you want to understand the details of how virtual inheritance is handled by the compiler, you should focus on the memory layout of the objects. Once you understand why the extra pointer per class that virtually derives is needed, the rest is simple.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

AFAIK, It's agreed that accessing virtual members from constructor is a dangerous practice. Can
AFAIK, for pointers/references static_cast, if a class definition is not visible to compiler at
AFAIK there is no DOS in vista and windows 7, but I need to
AFAIK, there are two ways of passing data to the view from controller :
AFAIK, a thread can not access UI components. But I want to preload images
AFAIK, the httpsessionlisterner implementation listener class is get instantiated when the first session is
I know C# is getting a lot of parallel programming support, but AFAIK there
AFAIK anything placed inside ContentPlaceHolder is simply overwritten when the child merges with the
virtual const char* what() const throw() { } AFAIK it's a function that will
AFAIK: C++ provides three different types of polymorphism. Virtual functions Function name overloading Operator

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.