Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 116521
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 11, 20262026-05-11T03:11:28+00:00 2026-05-11T03:11:28+00:00

After getting fine answer to my previous question , I came across another problem.

  • 0

After getting fine answer to my previous question, I came across another problem.

I followed the third approach, being aware of what djangodocs say about abstract model subclassing.

I am using the latest Django, rev 9814. The strange behaviour I get:

In [1]: o = Order()  In [2]: o.save() DEBUG:root:STORING EVENT MESSAGE: Order created. pk=2 -- LEVEL TOP DEBUG:root:Saving order pk=2   # it actually does exist in the database, so everything's cool.  In [3]: o.id Out[3]: 2L # huh?  In [4]: o._default_manager Out[4]: <django.db.models.manager.Manager object at 0x16e5370>  In [5]: Order.objects.all() Out[5]: []  # WTF? and even more WTF below:  In [6]: Order.objects.get(id=2)  --------------------------------------------------------------------------- TypeError                                 Traceback (most recent call last)  /Users/adam/_dev/cashfire/<ipython console>   /opt/local/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/2.4/lib/python2.4/site-packages/django/db/models/manager.py in get(self, *args, **kwargs)      91       92     def get(self, *args, **kwargs): ---> 93         return self.get_query_set().get(*args, **kwargs)      94       95     def get_or_create(self, **kwargs):  /opt/local/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/2.4/lib/python2.4/site-packages/django/db/models/query.py in get(self, *args, **kwargs)     333         '''     334         clone = self.filter(*args, **kwargs) --> 335         num = len(clone)     336         if num == 1:     337             return clone._result_cache[0]  /opt/local/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/2.4/lib/python2.4/site-packages/django/db/models/query.py in __len__(self)     159                 self._result_cache = list(self._iter)     160             else: --> 161                 self._result_cache = list(self.iterator())     162         elif self._iter:     163             self._result_cache.extend(list(self._iter))  /opt/local/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/2.4/lib/python2.4/site-packages/django/db/models/query.py in iterator(self)     286             else:     287                 # omit aggregates in object creation --> 288                 obj = self.model(*row[index_start:aggregate_start])     289      290             for i, k in enumerate(extra_select):  TypeError: __init__() takes exactly 1 argument (5 given) 
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. 2026-05-11T03:11:28+00:00Added an answer on May 11, 2026 at 3:11 am

    Ok, my fault (the Pragmatic Progammer’s ‘Don’t blame SQL’ again). It was exactly what traceback was saying, forgot about __init__‘s args & kwagrs. Silly me.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

After upgrade to Rails 3.0.10 I'm getting strange error if I set config.cache_classes=true NoMethodError
Spoiler: I'm fairly confident that the answer is NO , but that's only after
Please see my answer to this question below. It is based upon Kevin's input,
After having read Ian Boyd 's constructor series questions ( 1 , 2 ,
According to this answer boost and STL headers belong into the precompiled header file
I have been looking for quite some time for an answer to this, and
Quick Express.js question. I've been building a simple rpg charactersheet app over the past
I'm in the process of porting some code from Linux to Mac OS X.
I am attempting to pull some information from my tnsnames file using regex. I
I'm trying to build a Chrome browser extension, that should enhance the way the

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.