Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 184469
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 11, 20262026-05-11T15:17:52+00:00 2026-05-11T15:17:52+00:00

After performing EXPLAIN on a query: explain select name from t1 where name like

  • 0

After performing EXPLAIN on a query:

explain  select name from t1 where name like '%smthing%' UNION ALL select name from t2 where name like '%smthing%' UNION ALL select name from t3 where name like '%smthing%' UNION ALL select name from t4 where name like '%smthing%' 

composed by the UNION of 4 tables I get this:

 id  select_type   table         type    possible_keys  key     key_len  ref         rows  Extra                     1  PRIMARY       t1             index   (NULL)         name    152      (NULL)      337  Using where; Using index  2  UNION         t2             index   (NULL)         name    152      (NULL)    3842  Using where; Using index  3  UNION         t3             index   (NULL)         name    452      (NULL)     204  Using where; Using index  4  UNION         t4             index   (NULL)         name    452      (NULL)    8269  Using where; Using index (NULL)  UNION RESULT  <union1,2,3,4>  ALL     (NULL)         (NULL)  (NULL)   (NULL)  (NULL)   

When each component of the union is explained, the types are ‘INDEX’ however, union result’s type is ‘ALL’. Which is the reason for this behavior? Thanks

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. 2026-05-11T15:17:53+00:00Added an answer on May 11, 2026 at 3:17 pm

    Try using UNION ALL instead of UNION – otherwise MySQL will try to remove any duplicate rows (presumably minus the table indecies, as it’s looking at the result set).

    Also, do you have an ORDER BY or WHERE clause on the result of the UNION? Again, this will be performed on the result set, rather than at the table level.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 174k
  • Answers 174k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer You could use: String s = new String('"', 1); or… May 12, 2026 at 2:50 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Use WebRequest rather than WebBrowser You can change your implementation… May 12, 2026 at 2:50 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer EDIT1: I think I miss understood the question first time.… May 12, 2026 at 2:50 pm

Related Questions

I have inherited a somewhat messy query that I am working on refactoring to
IDE = VS7 or 2002 Hi all, I have a really weird problem here.
I have command button added in my asp.net grids. After performing an action using
In LINQ to SQL, is it necessary to close the context after performing a

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.