Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 9031377
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 16, 20262026-06-16T07:43:04+00:00 2026-06-16T07:43:04+00:00

After reading a comment to an answer in another question and doing a little

  • 0

After reading a comment to an answer in another question and doing a little research, I see that =~ is defined on Object and then overridden by String and Regexp. The implementations for String and Regexp appear to assume the other class:

"123" =~ "123" # => TypeError: type mismatch: String given
/123/ =~ /123/ # => TypeError: can't convert Regexp to String

Although =~ is defined for Object, + is not:

Object.new =~ 1 # => nil
Object.new + 1 # => undefined method `+' for #<Object:0x556d38>

Why has Object#=~ been defined, rather than restricting =~ to to String and Regexp?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-16T07:43:05+00:00Added an answer on June 16, 2026 at 7:43 am

    Because it allows any object to be used in a match expression:

    Object.new =~ /abc/
    => nil
    

    I guess this makes sense in the way that Object.new does not match the regexp /abc/ and the code would blow up if the left argument wasn’t a String object. So it generally simplifies the code because you can have any object on the left side of the =~ operator.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

After reading answer to this question: Make "make" default to "make -j 8" I
MAJOR EDIT: Problem was solved after reading Will Dean's comment. The original question is
After reading the answer here, I understand that, if I register a user control
After reading this question, I need to clear up some things. IQueryable<Customer> custs =
After providing some answers here, and reading some comments, it would seem that, in
Background I'm writing an asynchronous comment system for my website, after reading plenty of
After reading this question ASP.NET MVC: Nesting ViewModels within each other, antipattern or no?
After reading http://dsecrg.com/files/pub/pdf/XSS_in_images_evasion_bypass_(eng).pdf , it is clear that allowing image uploads from users opens
After reading monkeytalk faq from http://www.gorillalogic.com/testing-tools/monkeytalk/documentation/monkeytalk-faq : How does it all work? MonkeyTalk is
After reading MSDN-XAML Namespaces and MSDN-Understanding XAML Namespaces , I still do not understand

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.