Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 679921
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 14, 20262026-05-14T01:18:49+00:00 2026-05-14T01:18:49+00:00

After reading this question , i saw the answer by Naveen containing a link

  • 0

After reading this question, i saw the answer by Naveen containing a link to this page, which basically says, that casting from Derived** to Base** is forbidden since could change a pointer to an pointer to a Derived1 object point to a pointer to a Derived2 object (like: *derived1PtrPtr=derived2Ptr).

OK, i understand this is evil …

But when casting Derived** to Base*const* this is not even possible, so whats the reason that this is not allowed anyway ?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-14T01:18:49+00:00Added an answer on May 14, 2026 at 1:18 am

    First thing is that, if you really need to, you can cast any pointer type to any other pointer type. For instance, you can cast to void* as an intermediate step.

    Second, with pointers-to-pointers, it’s not so much that there’s a reason to make particular cases hard as that there are no special rules to make any particular cases easy.

    Basically, you have a pointer to X – where X in your case happens to be another pointer. Some X cases get special treatment (e.g. derived classes can implicitly cast to bases) – but your X is not one of them. It’s not the base class – it’s a pointer. There are no implicit casts defined for derived**, other than to void* – you can’t even implicitly cast derived** to void**.

    I don’t think the const has much to do with it in this case, though I could be missing something.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I am trying to learn how to use rand_r, and after reading this question
After reading this SE Discussion a question pops up. Why jquery defined two methods
I am posting this question after reading other similar questions about my problem but
After reading a series of man pages and searching through google, I decided to
Further to this question here , I'm really interested in creating my own UITabBar,
I got this message: expected 'void **' but argument is of type 'char **'
OK, I am sure some of you already know whats happening just by my
I've been thinking of some concepts underlying a new language. It was kind of
I have eclipse Galileo 3.5 with maven plugin installed. I want to know if
I've got an enum type defined in the private section of my class. I

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.