Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6634935
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 25, 20262026-05-25T22:59:22+00:00 2026-05-25T22:59:22+00:00

After reading topics here about Java synchronized methods, I’ve tried to implement it in

  • 0

After reading topics here about Java synchronized methods, I’ve tried to implement it in my multiplayer game because many threads are opened and trying to access the same resource.
I’ve made methods synchronized but that’s doesn’t help me since if I have a data member called ArrayList clientConnection; and the methods that are available are:

int getArrayListSize() {
    clientConnection.size();
}

void addConnection(ServerConnection i_connection) {
    clientConnection.add(i_connection);
}

void removeConnection(ServerConnection i_connection) {
    int index = clientConnections.indexOf(i_Connection);
    clientConnections.remove(index);
}

ServerConnection getClientFromArrayListByIndex(int i_Index) {
    ServerConnection client = this.clientConnections.get(i_Index);
}

I’ve tried to make a global synchronized method to whenever one want to use one of the methods he needs to pass in an operation type and other data and he locks the function.
The problem is that there are 2 function that return void, 1 returns int and 1 returns ServerConnection so I can’t create that global method.
My question if there is a possible to lock data members and not methods in Java so I can lock the clientConnection data member?
Thanks.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-25T22:59:23+00:00Added an answer on May 25, 2026 at 10:59 pm

    You can synchronize a function by using the synchronized keyword. For example:

    synchronized ServerConnection getClientFromArrayListByIndex(int i_Index) { 
        ServerConnection client = this.clientConnections.get(i_Index);
        // ...
    }
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

After reading this question , I was reminded of when I was taught Java
After reading a bit more about how Gnutella and other P2P networks function, I
After reading Practical Common Lisp I finally understood what the big deal about macros
After reading What’s your/a good limit for cyclomatic complexity? , I realize many of
After reading the topic Is MD5 really that bad , I was thinking about
After reading about Firefox's Geolocation functionality, which doesn't use GPS , I'm wondering what
After reading some reports about the inadequacies of the Mono 2.6 garbage collector, I
After reading the Head First Design Patterns book and using a number of other
After reading this description of late static binding (LSB) I see pretty clearly what
After reading Evan's and Nilsson's books I am still not sure how to manage

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.