Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 4091668
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 20, 20262026-05-20T19:23:45+00:00 2026-05-20T19:23:45+00:00

After spending a week of my time running using FastMM on my project file,

  • 0

After spending a week of my time running using FastMM on my project file, I now have completely gone through my program and to best of my knowledge remove all but 3 error messages raised by FastMM497. Now, I want to remove FastMM from my program and run without it.
Can I do that? If I remove it and run my program, will my program start leaking memory? To best of my knowledge I have removed and changed my project option setting back to the way it was before.

However, I did notice that my program is a lot bigger in when I run the executable file. Originally, my program used to be around 5,000KB to 6,000KB when it starts up. After working through FastMM, now it is around 21,000KB in the Task Manager. Am I looking at this correctly?

Can I just leave FastMM497 in my program and deploy it as is to my users?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-20T19:23:46+00:00Added an answer on May 20, 2026 at 7:23 pm

    Well, I think you should leave the full version of FastMM around because presumably you will continue developing your program and you may inadvertently introduce more memory leaks. Having FastMM to tell you about these helps.

    However, what you don’t want to do is release to your users a version using the FastMM debug options. This is much slower and consumes much more memory, and also reports diagnostics which you presumably don’t want your users to see.

    What one normally does is have two build configurations, DEBUG and RELEASE. When you build DEBUG you have all the diagnostics options. When you build RELEASE you switch that all off. You would typically configure it through conditional defines which control settings in the FastMM include file, FastMMOptions.inc.

    The way I configure it is that the DEBUG configuration defines a condition called UseDebugFastMM and the RELEASE configuration does not. Then in FastMMOptions.inc I respond to that conditional by enabling all the debug features if it is defined.

    Having said all that, what I actually release to my clients does not use FastMM at all because I find it doesn’t perform terribly well under thread contention. Instead I use a custom memory manager that simply delegates to the malloc() to be found in msvcrt.dll which I find performs better. But it’s all controlled with conditionals and it’s well worth getting the project well configured so that you can easily experiment if you need to.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

After spending a week checking and fixing my program for memory leaks through FastMM4,
So I'm starting a project using Python after spending a significant amount of time
After spending a little time wondering why my app was running a particular scenario
I have got a Wavefront OBJ Parser up running but after spending endless hours
So, after spending the last week carefully designing and planning out my app, a
After spending some time wireframing my ideas, I want to start building my rails
I've just started looking at PHP Frameworks after spending loads of wasted time doing
After spending a couple months studying DDD methodology, I've now began to apply these
After spending a not-insignificant amount of time converting a page that used concatenated html,
After spending 14 hours on this I think its time to share my woes

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.