Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 787839
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 14, 20262026-05-14T21:16:08+00:00 2026-05-14T21:16:08+00:00

Again i see that the @PostConstruct is firing every time even though no binding

  • 0

Again i see that the @PostConstruct is firing every time even though no binding attribute is used. See this code :-

<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8' ?>
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"
      xmlns:h="http://java.sun.com/jsf/html"
      xmlns:ui="http://java.sun.com/jsf/facelets"
      xmlns:c="http://java.sun.com/jsp/jstl/core">
    <h:head>
        <title>Facelet Title</title>
    </h:head>
    <h:body>
        <h:form>
            <c:forEach var="item" items="#{TestBean.listItems}">
                <h:outputText value="#{item}"/>
            </c:forEach>
            <h:commandButton value="Click" actionListener="#{TestBean.actionListener}"/>
        </h:form>
    </h:body>
</html>

And this is the simplest possible bean in JSF :-

package managedBeans;

import java.io.Serializable;
import java.util.ArrayList;
import java.util.List;
import javax.annotation.PostConstruct;
import javax.faces.bean.ManagedBean;
import javax.faces.bean.ViewScoped;

@ManagedBean(name="TestBean")
@ViewScoped
public class TestBean implements Serializable {

    private List<String> listItems;

    public List<String> getListItems() {
        return listItems;
    }

    public void setListItems(List<String> listItems) {
        this.listItems = listItems;
    }

    public TestBean() {

    }

    @PostConstruct
    public void init(){
        System.out.println("Post Construct fired!");
        listItems = new ArrayList<String>();
        listItems.add("Mango");
        listItems.add("Apple");
        listItems.add("Banana");
    }

    public void actionListener(){
        System.out.println("Action Listener fired!");
    }

}

Do you see any behaviour that should cause postconstruct callback to fire each time? I think JSF 2.0 is highly unstable. If it has to fire PostConstruct each and every time what purpose does @ViewScoped serve. Why not to use @RequestScoped only? I thought i have made some mistake in my application. But when i created this simplest possible in JSF, i still get this error. Am i not understanding the scopes of JSF? or are they not testing it properly? Further, if you remove c:forEach and replace it with ui:repeat, then it works fine.

Waiting for replies to confirm whether it is bug or it is intentional to stop the programmers from using jstl?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-14T21:16:09+00:00Added an answer on May 14, 2026 at 9:16 pm

    This problem has the same grounds as your previous question which is answered here: Why does @PostConstruct callback fire every time even though bean is @ViewScoped? JSF.

    This is indeed a bug in JSF2. It’s a chicken-egg issue. The view scoped beans are stored in the JSF view state. So the view scoped beans are only available after restore view phase. However, JSTL tags runs during restore view phase, while the view scoped beans are not available yet. This causes creation of a brand new view scoped bean instance, which is then later replaced by the real view scoped bean which was stored in the restored JSF view state.

    This is reported as JSF issue 1665 and JSF spec isssue 787 which is fixed for JSF 2.2 and ported back in Mojarra 2.1.18. So, just upgrading to a minimum of Mojarra 2.1.18 should do.

    If you can’t upgrade, then your best bet is to use JSTL tags on request/session/application scoped beans exclusively, or to look for alternate ways for the particular functional requirement. You can replace the <c:forEach> with <ui:repeat> as you already found out.

    See also:

    • Communication in JSF 2.0 – @ViewScoped fails in taghandlers
    • JSTL in JSF2 Facelets… makes sense?
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 382k
  • Answers 382k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer here's the code: public static short twoBytesToShort(byte b1, byte b2)… May 14, 2026 at 10:30 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer I would not use a hidden field, because even if… May 14, 2026 at 10:30 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer You need to qualify the elements in your XPath. At… May 14, 2026 at 10:30 pm

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.