Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 9139271
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 17, 20262026-06-17T09:21:57+00:00 2026-06-17T09:21:57+00:00

Alright so basically I have 3 threads. Each one of them use a function

  • 0

Alright so basically I have 3 threads.

Each one of them use a function which inside uses the send() on a specific socket (let’s call it S).
Here’s a small design:

http://i.imgur.com/5N744.png

How would I synchronize the S socket in such a way so that send() will be called one after another in a queue instead of the threads accessing the socket all at the same time?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-17T09:21:58+00:00Added an answer on June 17, 2026 at 9:21 am

    First, why not have an actual queue of data to be sent, and a dedicated IO thread popping items off of it and writing to the socket?

    Then, if you are using regular blocking socket semantics, you can just write to the same socket from all three threads concurrently – the kernel will provide required locking at the system call level.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Alright, so basically what I'm trying to do is use the value (which in
Alright so I have no idea how to even begin doing this But basically
Alright, so I have been wondering how to do this for a while. Basically,
Alright basically i have the code at the bottom and it works perfectly if
Alright, so I have a base class which we'll call TFruit . From this
Alright so here is my problem. Basically I have a string with 4 words
Alright SO users. I am trying to learn and use CouchDB. I have the
I've got an odd situation. Basically, I have two custom bindings which are used
Alright so pretty basic, here are the pieces of code I have, basically it's
I have a class which basically is a text manager. It can draw text

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.