Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7489029
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 29, 20262026-05-29T15:11:26+00:00 2026-05-29T15:11:26+00:00

Am getting used to CoffeeScript, and have what is probably a stupid question: how

  • 0

Am getting used to CoffeeScript, and have what is probably a stupid question: how do I call a function on an anoymous function? So here’s the javascript example

baz = function() {
   this.do_something_to_this_function
}
foo = {
    bar: function() {
        // do something to some data
    }.baz()
}

How would I do this same thing in CoffeeScript?

I know I could do this:

barfunc = => blah blah blah
foo = {
    bar: barfunc.baz()
}

It seems there must be a prettier way?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-29T15:11:27+00:00Added an answer on May 29, 2026 at 3:11 pm

    Just add parentheses.

    foo =
      bar: (=> blah blah blah).baz()
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Apologies if this is a stupid/easy question, but still getting used to everything in
So I'm just getting used to mocking stuff. I have this private variable here:
I'm just getting used to Subversion and I have a fundamental question about versioning.
I have used all the Standard Network related code for Getting Images of about
I'm getting used to using nant for build releases. But I have started to
I have recently started using R and am still getting used to its data
I have been getting into Unit Testing with Zend Framework. I am getting used
Quick ActionScript question, since I'm still getting used to the language: Is it possible
I'm still getting used to the way ASP.net WebForms handles things but this one
I'm getting used to TDD, but up to this point I only had to

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.