Home/ Questions/Q 8649507
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Asked: 2026-06-12T13:34:43+00:00

Amazon upgraded the SSL security in its AWS Java SDK in the 1.3.21 version.

  • 0

Amazon “upgraded” the SSL security in its AWS Java SDK in the 1.3.21 version. This broke access any S3 buckets that have periods in their name when using Amazon’s AWS Java API. I’m using version 1.3.21.1 which is current up to Oct/5/2012. I’ve provided some solutions in my answer below but I’m looking for additional work arounds to this issue.

If you are getting this error, you will see something like the following message in your exceptions/logs. In this example, the bucket name is foo.example.com.

INFO: Unable to execute HTTP request: hostname in certificate didn't match:
       <foo.example.com.s3.amazonaws.com> != <*.s3.amazonaws.com>
       OR <*.s3.amazonaws.com> OR <s3.amazonaws.com>
at org.apache.http.conn.ssl.AbstractVerifier.verify(AbstractVerifier.java:220)
at org.apache.http.conn.ssl.StrictHostnameVerifier.verify(StrictHostnameVerifier.java:61)
at org.apache.http.conn.ssl.AbstractVerifier.verify(AbstractVerifier.java:149)
at org.apache.http.conn.ssl.AbstractVerifier.verify(AbstractVerifier.java:130)
at org.apache.http.conn.ssl.SSLSocketFactory.connectSocket(SSLSocketFactory.java:390)

You can see documentation of this problem on the AWS S3 discussion forum:

https://forums.aws.amazon.com/thread.jspa?messageID=387508&#387508

Amazon’s response to the problem is the following.

We should be able to fix this by using the older path style method of bucket addressing (instead of the newer virtual host style addressing) for buckets with this naming pattern. We’ll get started on the fix and ensure that our internal integration tests have test cases for buckets names containing periods.

Any workaround or other solutions? Thanks for any feedback.

Share

Leave an answer

You must login to add an answer.

Need An Account,

1 Answer

  1. Editorial Team

    Original: October 2012

    Turns out that Amazon "upgraded" the SSL security on S3 in late September 2012. This broke access any S3 buckets that have periods in their name when using Amazon’s AWS Java API.

    This is inaccurate. S3’s SSL wildcard matching has been the same as when S3 launched back in 2006. What’s more likely is that the AWS Java SDK team enabled stricter validation of SSL certificates (good), but ended up breaking bucket names that have been running afoul of S3’s SSL cert (bad).

    The right answer is that you need to use path-style addressing instead of DNS-style addressing. That is the only secure way of working around the issue with the wildcard matching on the SSL certificate. Disabling the verification opens you up to Man-In-The-Middle attacks.

    What I don’t presently know is if the Java SDK provides this as a configurable option. If so, that’s your answer. Otherwise, it sounds like the Java SDK team said "we’ll add this feature, and then add integration tests to make sure it all works."

    Update: October 2020

    AWS has announced that path-style addressing is deprecated will be going away in the near-future. AWS’ advice is to use DNS-compatible bucket names, which means no periods (among a few other things). Certain newer features of S3 require DNS-compatible bucket names (e.g., accelerated transfer).

    If you require a bucket name which contains periods (which will also be disallowed for new buckets in the near future), my best advice is to put a CloudFront distribution in front of it if you want to hit it over HTTPS.

    • 0