Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 109293
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 11, 20262026-05-11T02:02:48+00:00 2026-05-11T02:02:48+00:00

An explicit instantiation of a static template member function keeps failing to compile with

  • 0

An explicit instantiation of a static template member function keeps failing to compile with the message error C2785: 'at_Intermediate CUtil::convert_variant(const VARIANT &)' and '<Unknown>' have different return types

When I make a corresponding class with non-static member functions, the compiler likes me.

// utility class - static methods struct CUtil {       template< typename at_Intermediate > static at_Intermediate convert_variant( const VARIANT &v ) ;        template<> static VARIANT convert_variant<VARIANT >( const VARIANT &v ) { return v; } //        template<> static double  convert_variant<double  >( const VARIANT &v ) { return v.dblVal; }       template<> static long    convert_variant<long    >( const VARIANT &v ) { return v.lVal  ; }       template<> static BSTR    convert_variant<BSTR    >( const VARIANT &v ) { return v.bstrVal; } }; 

This is a composed question:

  1. Why does the compiler complain about a function ‘Unknown’ while it’s clearly known?

  2. What triggers this message – it disappears when the function is made global or non-static.

EDIT:

after some useful hints from Josh: is it not allowed to explicitly instantiate template functions within the class declaration?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. 2026-05-11T02:02:48+00:00Added an answer on May 11, 2026 at 2:02 am

    Apparently you may only use explicit template specialization at namespace scope although I can’t find this in the standard (but GCC says as much). The following works for me (on GCC):

    struct CUtil {     template< typename at_Intermediate > static at_Intermediate convert_variant( const VARIANT &v ) ; };  template<> VARIANT CUtil::convert_variant<VARIANT >( const VARIANT &v ) { return v; } template<> double  CUtil::convert_variant<double  >( const VARIANT &v ) { return v.dblVal; } template<> long    CUtil::convert_variant<long    >( const VARIANT &v ) { return v.lVal  ; } template<> BSTR    CUtil::convert_variant<BSTR    >( const VARIANT &v ) { return v.bstrVal; } 

    EDIT It is in the standard:

    14.7.2.5:

    An explicit instantiation of a class or function template specialization is placed in the namespace in which the template is defined. An explicit instantiation for a member of a class template is placed in the namespace where the enclosing class is defined. An explicit instantiation for a member template is placed in the namespace where the enclosing class or class template is defined.

    (All emphasis added by me.)

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

In a template-declaration, explicit specialization, or explicit instantiation the init-declarator-list in the declaration shall
I have the following class in C++/CLI and an explicit template instantiation for the
I've just been reading about template explicit instantiation: template struct MyStruct<long>; It was described
If a template code is about to be used for DLL the explicit instantiation
Does explicit template instantiation go in cpp or header file?
In my previous question I asked is recursive explicit template instantiation possible . I
I've two different template classes. One of them has a member function that returns
I am writing a class in which I want to create member function template
I cannot figure out why this segment gives unresolved overloaded function error (gcc version
I have a problem with class member function templates. It seems that gcc is

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.