Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 727809
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 14, 20262026-05-14T06:36:35+00:00 2026-05-14T06:36:35+00:00

and is flash being replaced by another standard like html 5 completely?

  • 0

and is flash being replaced by another standard like html 5 completely?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-14T06:36:35+00:00Added an answer on May 14, 2026 at 6:36 am

    No, Flash Player and other mentionable browser plugins (Silverlight, Unity, Java FX, O3D) will not be replaced by web standards in the foreseeable future.

    Web standards move slowly and have to be implemented by every major browser vendor and then updated by all users to be actually usefull. To understand what this means, one should consider that IE 6 still has about 9% market share today.

    In contrast to web standards, a 3d party browser plugin is maintained by only one company. If that company decides to add or alter features of their plugin, all they have to do is to implement the changes and have users install according updates.

    Thus web standards are feature designs that need to satisfy a committee consisting of several major companies, who have different interests and ideas, and that has multiple implementations that must be written, tested and fixed.
    In contrast, 3rd party plugins stem from a feature design made by one company, with only one implementation to be maintained by that very same company.

    For this reason, 3rd party plugins will always offer functionality web standards will implement much later, if at all.

    As a comparison: Flash supports vector graphics since its release in 1997, streaming audio since 1999 and video since 2002. HTML5 is barely implemented on some browsers and the standard is due for 2022. Now everyone is so excited about HTML5, since in a near future some (possibly incompatible) implementations will be able to do the things Flash did in the last millenium. yeah!!!!

    The biggest problem here is ignorance and arrogance. The ignorance causes further arrogance and the arrogance causes further ignorance.

    The truth is, web technology is always far ahead of what is actually implemented. Since a few years, everybody is hot about AJAX. None the less it relies on techniques that have been available and used since more than a decade. Youtube was launched 3 years after Flash had streaming video capabilities. And only since a few years has internet video become the new trend. While now everybody sees the new trend, they’re excited that it’ll one day no longer rely on 3rd party plugins. How great.

    The web as a platform is very often looked down at by classical developers. That is, because they assess only what they see and infer from that, that the available technologies are not capable of more. In turn, many web developers look down on Flash developers, since they make the very same mistake. All they see is banners, video player and poorly created multimedia sites loading for ages and annoying visitors with awful sounds. Rest assured: once HTML5 is available, such sites will be created in HTML5 as well.

    The main point is, Flash is a platform capable of creating great apps, such as Phoenix, Sliderocket or Tanki Online, just to name a few outstanding ones. Flash supports P2P communication, video/voice transmission, TCP and many other things that are really far from being exploited in any major apps. Flash for example currently provides all necessary means to move chatting (IM, audio, video) into the browser, which may hit the web like web videos hit it years ago. Who knows.

    HTML5’s role is not to replace Flash but to provide better semantics and utilities for common information presentation in the web. The task of 3rd party plugins is the presentation of uncommon information and to provide features that are potentially the basis of further innovation.

    These technologies, including HTML, all have their place. And depending on what you’re planning to do, there’s always the right tool.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I'm new to Flash and not sure why my new planet object is being
Situation: Got a flash object with an icon bar (div with pngs) on top
My client request a flash header for his website. I'm using asp.net and a
I wanted to ask any Flash gurus here if they have any best practices
The following embed code works fine when I load swfobject.js locally. However, when I
I have a list of YouTube videos on a page and I want to
UPDATE: This seem to only be an issue with ul / li if i
I have the following code in a Controller: $data['what'] = 'test'; $this->load->view('test_view', $data); $this->load->view('test_view');
Confused by a problem with ExternalInterface.addcallback. Mainly because I have it ALWAYS working locally,
When a user visits our site they see a coverflow. They are not logged

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.