Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6216247
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 24, 20262026-05-24T07:12:04+00:00 2026-05-24T07:12:04+00:00

Any ideas on a good interface for a singleton with an isEnabled method? For

  • 0

Any ideas on a good interface for a singleton with an isEnabled method?

For example, I have a UDPClient and only want to create the Socket once, so I’m setting it up as a singleton. And I want the app to continue if the configuration says to enable it, but it cannot.

Can I do better than this client code and the resulting singleton implementation? (and please correct me if I’ve screwed up the singleton). This will be used in a web app if it makes any difference.

public class UDPConnectionManager {
    private static final UDPConnectionManager INSTANCE = new UDPConnectionManager();
    private UDPClient udp = null;

    private UDPConnectionManager() {
        try {
            InitialContext ic = new InitialContext();

            String udpHost = (String) ic.lookup("java:comp/env/udpHost");
            Integer udpPort = (Integer) ic.lookup("java:comp/env/udpPort");
            Boolean udpEnabled = (Boolean) ic.lookup("java:comp/env/udpEnabled");

            if (udpEnabled) {
                udp = new UDPClient(udpHost, udpPort);
            }
        } catch (Exception e) {
            log.error("UDP Connection Manager:  error while setting up UDP Manager.", e);
        }
    }

    public static UDPConnectionManager instance() {
        return INSTANCE;
    }

    public UDPClient getUDPClient() {
        return udp;
    }

    public Boolean isEnabled() {
        return (udp != null);
    }
}

Client:

UDPClient udpCM = UDPConnectionManager.instance();
if (udpCM.isEnabled()) {
    UDPClient udpClient = udpcCM.getUDPClient();
    udpClient.send("test");
}
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-24T07:12:05+00:00Added an answer on May 24, 2026 at 7:12 am

    If you expect it to be sort of a fire-and-forget-even-if-its-not-available sort of thing, then you might ease the burden on the client and just put the send() method on the singleton.

    By doing this, you can have the singleton do the check, and not send it if it’s null.

    public class UDPConnectionManager {
        private UDPConnectionManager() { ... }
        public static UDPConnectionManager instance() { ... }
    
        public void send(String message) {
            if(udp != null) {
                udp.send(message);
            }
        }
    }
    

    Don’t make the client do anything the module could do (PDF, page 27)

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Anyone have any ideas on a good way to model the following scenario in
Are there any cases when it's a good idea to throw errors that can
Does anyone know of any good tools (I'm looking for IDEs) to write assembly
I love the idea of Grizzly, but I can't find any good examples to
Any ideas on how to implement tab completion for a .NET (C#) Console Application?
Any ideas what the average user's download speed is? I'm working on a site
Any ideas how to determine the number of active threads currently running in an
Any ideas how to display a PDF file in a WPF Windows Application? I
Any ideas on how to disable, but not uninstall Resharper 4.x or above?
Any ideas why this won't validate here: http://validator.w3.org/#validate_by_input It seems the form input tags

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.