Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 888605
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 15, 20262026-05-15T13:25:37+00:00 2026-05-15T13:25:37+00:00

Any ideas on this? Is there some kind of a signal queue, or does

  • 0

Any ideas on this? Is there some kind of a signal queue, or does it get dropped?

While we are at this question, is it true that signal handlers should do as minimal work as possible?

I read somewhere that a signal handler should use a pipe and just write one byte to it, indicating what the program should do. Then somewhere else the program periodically checks the pipe, and dispatches based on byte in it. (I might have misunderstood it)

Thanks, Boda Cydo.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-15T13:25:37+00:00Added an answer on May 15, 2026 at 1:25 pm

    To answer the second part of your question, “is it true that signal handlers should do as minimal work as possible?” the answer is yes, because there is a very minimal set of functions that are “async signal safe” and therefore able to be called from signal handlers. Async signal safety is kind of an enhanced form of re-entrancy. If foo() is async signal safe, that means that it’s safe to call foo() within a signal handler, even if foo() was already executing when the signal was raised.

    You can get the full list of async signal safe functions by looking that the section 7 man page for signal (man 7 signal). Calling any function other than one of these from within a signal handler, directly or indirectly, invokes undefined behavior.

    The “write a byte to a pipe” approach is a great way to deal with signals without being restricted to async signal safe functions, especially if your program is already oriented around a select loop.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Anyone have any ideas to clean this up? public string FullName { get {
Here is the code, any ideas why I get this error? private SQLiteDataAdapter DA_Webfiles;
I have some code that does something like this (Irrelevant bits snipped): void foo(Bitmap
I have some code that looks more or less like this: while(scanner.hasNext()) { if(scanner.findInLine(Test)
any ideas why this is causing my app to behave poorly? I did notice
Any ideas on why this could be breaking? foreach (var p in pp) {
Any ideas how to fix this? UserService.UserServiceClient userServiceClient = new UserServiceClient(); userServiceClient.GetUsersCompleted += new
Anybody have any ideas? The situation is like this: I have a primary rails
I have this mysql query. Any ideas how to order the results in order
I THINK this line is causing a 3.5K Byte memory leak, any ideas why?

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.