Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 727751
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 14, 20262026-05-14T06:36:11+00:00 2026-05-14T06:36:11+00:00

Any reasons why this can not be standard behavior of free() ? multiple pointers

  • 0

Any reasons why this can not be standard behavior of free()?

multiple pointers pointing to the same object:

#include <stdlib.h>
#include <stdio.h>

void safefree(void*& p)
{
    free(p); p = NULL;
}

int main()
{
    int *p = (int *)malloc(sizeof(int));
    *p = 1234;
    int*& p2 = p;
    printf("p=%p p2=%p\n", p, p2);
    safefree((void*&)p2);
    printf("p=%p p2=%p\n", p, p2);
    safefree((void*&)p); // safe

    return 0;
}

assignment from malloc demands cast from void*

vice versa:

safefree() demands cast to void*& (reference)

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-14T06:36:12+00:00Added an answer on May 14, 2026 at 6:36 am

    If it did, you would have to pass a pointer to a pointer to the function:

    int * p = malloc( sizeof( int ));
    free( & p );
    

    which I’m sure many people would get wrong.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Are there any good reasons for why you would include JavaScript like this: <script
Is there any reasons why PHP's json_encode function does not escape all JSON control
Maybe someone can explain this behavior. Sometimes I will do an SVN update, and
I am sure this is pretty standard stuff, but I can't seem to wrap
Is there any reason why this shouldn't work? [PseudoCode] main() { for (int i
Is there any reason to do use block initialization, like this: x = Observer.new
Are there any good reasons to modify your project's build output path from its
I've got a web application that, for performance reasons, throws any data sent into
Is there any reason why images are not being displayed if I place it
Here's a standard scenario: if(string.IsNullOrEmpty(Configuration.AppSettings[foobar])) throw new SomeStandardException(Application not configured correctly, bozo.); The problem

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.