Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6133659
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 23, 20262026-05-23T17:15:27+00:00 2026-05-23T17:15:27+00:00

Anyone any clue as to why there is an uppercase VOID macro defined in

  • 0

Anyone any clue as to why there is an uppercase VOID macro defined in the winnt.h header?

To make matters more confusing, VOID is a macro, whereas CHAR, SHORT, INT, and LONG are typedefs.

See the relevant excerpt from winnt.h:

#ifndef VOID
#define VOID void
typedef char CHAR;
typedef short SHORT;
typedef long LONG;
#if !defined(MIDL_PASS)
typedef int INT;
#endif
#endif

A historical reason perhaps for doing VOID* pointer instead of void* pointer?

EDIT: What is even more troubling is to see people using VOID instead of void when doing Windows programming today. You can also see it as part of MSDN docs, e.g. http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb205867(v=vs.85).aspx

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-23T17:15:28+00:00Added an answer on May 23, 2026 at 5:15 pm

    The original reason is that the Win32 API was originally supposed to be language independent, so they made up their own names (following their naming convention), and then provided a C implementation of that. In reality, much of what they defined tends to be ignored by most people using other languages (and largely even by people using C, for that matter).

    As far as why VOID is a #define instead of a typedef, that’s pretty simple: the required typedef would be typedef void VOID;, but C (as “defined” by Microsoft’s C compilers from that time) simply doesn’t allow that, so they use a macro instead.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Anyone have any experience yet getting Radiant CMS extensions to actually make it onto
Anyone have any suggestions on how to make randomized colors that are all greenish?
Anyone have any clue what this error might actually mean? I'm tripping on a
Anyone have any ideas what I can do? Please reserve commenting about using 1.1
Anyone have any idea how to connect to their FTP server? I am using
Anyone have any ideas on a good way to model the following scenario in
anyone knows any java utility method that would convert windows paths to DOS 8.3
anyone shed any light as to why this might be happening for one user
Anyone seen any tangible metrics or sites that talk about the percentages of Rails
Anyone have any luck getting JScrollPane to work with JQuery? I'm following the instructions

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.