Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 725449
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 14, 20262026-05-14T06:20:18+00:00 2026-05-14T06:20:18+00:00

Apologies for the vague question. Here it is: I have a table object created

  • 0

Apologies for the vague question. Here it is: I have a table object created by LINQ to SQL. I am copying entries from one table to an “archive” table that has all the columns of the original, plus a couple extra ones.

It feels sloppy to iterate through every object and manually define the mapping like:

foreach (oldTable in dbContextOldTables)
{
   var newTable = new NewTable();
   newTable.TableID = oldTable.ID;
   newTable.Title = oldTable.Title;
   ... (repeat for twenty columns)
   newTable.ColumnThatIsntInOldTable = "Data that will be the same for every row";
   dbContext.NewTables.InsertOnSubmit(newTable);
} 
dbContext.SubmitChanges();

Is there a clever way to do this?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-14T06:20:19+00:00Added an answer on May 14, 2026 at 6:20 am

    Consider using dbConext.ExecuteCommand() function to execute SQL directly, e.g.:

    ctx.ExecuteCommand("INSERT INTO backup SELECT * FROM original");
    

    Alternatively you could use InsertAllOnSubmit, e.g.:

    var entries = dbContextOldTables.AsEnumerable().Select(x => new NewTable() { /* mapping */ });
    dbContext.NewTables.InsertAllOnSubmit(entries);
    

    Edit 2010-04-09:

    Passing an IQueryable into InsertAllOnSubmit that constructs a new item (i.e. new NewTable()) fails for the following reason (source):

    This check was added because it was supposed to be there from the beginning and was missing. Constructing entity instances manually as a projection pollutes the cache with potentially malformed objects, leading to confused programmers and lots of bug reports for us. In addition, it is ambiguous whether projected entities should be in the cache or changed tracked at all. The usage pattern for entities is that they are created outside of queries and inserted into tables via the DataContext and then later retrieved via queries, never created by queries.

    So the error occurs because the IQueryable is trying to create an item on the cache by executing and SQL query that returns the item specified by the select. Converting the IQueryable into an IEnumberable using the AsEnumerable() function breaks the SQL generation. So the query generated just selects the item (i.e. the SQL does not do the mapping) and the construction of the new item is done outside the Linq to SQL logic.

    To be sure I tested the approach using a Northwind DB in which I created a copy of the Categories table using the code below:

    using (var ctx = new NorthwindDataContext()) {
        var categories = ctx.Categories;
    
        var catcopy = categories.Select(x => new CategoriesBackup() {
            CategoryID = x.CategoryID,
            CategoryName = x.CategoryName,
            Description = x.Description,
            Picture = x.Picture
        });
        //ctx.CategoriesBackups.InsertAllOnSubmit(catcopy);  // THIS DOES NOT WORK
    
        var catcopy2 = categories.AsEnumerable().Select(x => new CategoriesBackup() {
            CategoryID = x.CategoryID,
            CategoryName = x.CategoryName,
            Description = x.Description,
            Picture = x.Picture
        });
        ctx.CategoriesBackups.InsertAllOnSubmit(catcopy2);  // THIS WORKS
    }
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.