Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8942547
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 15, 20262026-06-15T11:32:29+00:00 2026-06-15T11:32:29+00:00

Apparently, Flask’s app.route / app.add_url_rule doesn’t work with closures. For example, creating a basic

  • 0

Apparently, Flask’s app.route / app.add_url_rule doesn’t work with closures. For example, creating a basic app with,

for name in ('/hi', '/bye'):
    app.add_url_rule(name, view_func=lambda: name)

and querying it,

dev:~/pg/yelp-main> curl localhost:9113/hi
/bye

shows that it doesn’t work with closures. What’s the easiest way to work around this? Can I force Python to actually create two functions?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-15T11:32:31+00:00Added an answer on June 15, 2026 at 11:32 am

    You haven’t actually created a closure in your code that preserves the value of name:

    view_func=lambda: name  # <- points at the *symbol*, which holds the *last* value
    # in the case of a loop
    

    To preserve the value you need to pass the value into the closure:

    view_maker = lambda name: (lambda: name)
    
    for name in ('/hi', '/bye'):
        endpoint = name.replace("/", "")
        app.add_url_rule(name, view_func=view_maker(name), endpoint=endpoint)
    

    EDIT: In addition, you’ll need to ensure that each time you register a function using add_url_rule you either specify an endpoint or ensure each function has a unique __name__ (since Flask actually stores the routes in a dictionary keyed on the endpoint, which it derives from the function’s __name__ if no other is provided). Otherwise, your second view will overwrite your first one.

    You may want to look into Flask’s class-based Views – they may make it easier to build the dynamics you are looking for (although closures and classes are quite similar [in that both are the poor man’s substitute for the other]).

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Apparently (at least according to gcc -std=c99 ) C99 doesn't support function overloading. The
Apparently, Microsoft has not yet made WebGL work in Internet Explorer by default. Plus,
Apparently MapReduce queries are one of the slowest things one can do in MongoDB
Apparently when linking a library build with the Intel Composer 12.1 or against the
Apparently, using AttachDbFilename and user instance in your connection string is a bad way
Apparently there's a maximum number of arguments for std::thread for the std::thread implementation in
Apparently mutableCopy copies by reference, not value. Ie if I do this: NSMutableArray arrayA
Apparently, there's been a big brouhaha over whether or not Python needs tail-call optimization
Apparently the following is valid in c# 4.0 regardless of the type of the
Apparently Java only plays .au audio files and I want to play mp3 files.

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.