Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7599559
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 30, 20262026-05-30T22:41:31+00:00 2026-05-30T22:41:31+00:00

Apparently PostgreSQL 8.4 and Ubuntu 10.04 cannot handle the updated way to sort W

  • 0

Apparently PostgreSQL 8.4 and Ubuntu 10.04 cannot handle the updated way to sort W and V for Swedish alphabet. That is, it’s still ordering them as the same letter like this (old definition for Swedish ordering):

  • Wa
  • Vb
  • Wc
  • Vd

it should be (new definition for Swedish ordering):

  • Vb
  • Vd
  • Wa
  • Wc

I need to order this correctly for a Python/Django website I’m building. I have tried various ways to just order a list of tuples created from a Django QuerySet using *values_list*. But since it’s Swedish also å, ä and ö letters needs to be correctly ordered. Now I have either one or the other way both not both..

list_of_tuples = [(u'Wa', 1), (u'Vb',2), (u'Wc',3), (u'Vd',4), (u'Öa',5), (u'äa',6), (u'Åa',7)]

print '########## Ordering One ##############'
ordered_list_one = sorted(list_of_tuples, key=lambda t: tuple(t[0].lower()))
for item in ordered_list_one:
    print item[0]

print '########## Ordering Two ##############'
locale.setlocale(locale.LC_ALL, "sv_SE.utf8")
list_of_names = [u'Wa', u'Vb', u'Wc', u'Vd', u'Öa', u'äa', u'Åa']
ordered_list_two = sorted(list_of_names, cmp=locale.strcoll)
for item in ordered_list_two:
    print item

The examples gives:

########## Ordering One ##############
Vb
Vd
Wa
Wc
äa
Åa
Öa
########## Ordering Two ##############
Wa
Vb
Wc
Vd
Åa
äa
Öa

Now, What I want is a combination of these so that both V/W and å,ä,ö ordering are correct. To be more precise. I want Ordering One to respect locale. By then using the second item (object id) in each tuple I could fetch the correct object in Django.

I’m starting to doubt that this will be possible? Would upgrading PostgreSQL to a newer version that handles collations better and then use raw SQL in Django be possible?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-30T22:41:32+00:00Added an answer on May 30, 2026 at 10:41 pm

    When running LC_ALL=sv_SE.UTF-8 sort on your example on Ubuntu-10.04, it comes out with Wa before Vb (the “old way”), so Ubuntu does not seem to agree with the “new way”.
    Since PostgreSQL relies on the operating system for this, it will behave just the same as the OS given the same lc_collate.

    There is actually a patch in debian glibc related to this particular sort issue:
    http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9724
    But it was objected to and not accepted. If you only need this behavior on a system you administer, you can still apply the change of the patch to /usr/share/i18n/locales/sv_SE and rebuild the se_SV locale by running locale-gen sv_SE.UTF-8. Or better yet, create your own alternative locale derived from it to avoid messing with the original.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Apparently there is a database postgres that is created by default on each postgresql
So my syntax is apparently correct in all three cases (PostgreSQL isn't grousing about
Apparently, they're confusing. Is that seriously the reason? Can you think of any others?
Apparently I can't move files on different volumes using Directory.Move. I have read that
I am trying to use Heroku and apparently Postgresql is a lot more strict
Apparently Matlab load loads the data from a .mat file into the variable that
Apparently the speed of the C++ linker in Visual Studio 2010 hasn't improved that
Apparently, Groovy easily consumes web services. Can it consume a web service that needs
I'm trying to get Rails to work with PostgreSQL. Apparently one thing I need
Apparently some vendors (like Telerik) are working on versions of their controls that do

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.