Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.
Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.
Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
Apparently there is no generic version of a HybridDictionary.
Why is this? I always considered it to be a best-practice when you needed to store items in a dictionary, but didn’t know how many items were going to be in it.
Maybe because the Dictionary<> has better performance and less overhead than the HybridDictionary, even with only a few elements in it.
Or is there a new best-practice I’m not aware of?
The generic dictionary replaces Hybrid. The generic variants probably are hybrids, in the sense that they store and sort data in the most efficient way considering the amount of data to store.