Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 949209
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 15, 20262026-05-15T23:22:10+00:00 2026-05-15T23:22:10+00:00

Apparently this key-oriented access-protection pattern : class SomeKey { friend class Foo; SomeKey() {}

  • 0

Apparently this key-oriented access-protection pattern:

class SomeKey { 
    friend class Foo;
    SomeKey() {} 
    // possibly non-copyable too
};

class Bar {
public:
    void protectedMethod(SomeKey); // only friends of SomeKey have access
};

… doesn’t have a known name yet, thus i’d like to find a good one for it so we can refer to it without breaking our tongues. Suggestions?

It should be:

  • succinct
  • convey the intent of access-protection
  • ideally imply that no proxying is required (?)
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-15T23:22:11+00:00Added an answer on May 15, 2026 at 11:22 pm

    I like, in decreasing preference:

    • passkey friend idiom
    • passkey-door friend idiom
    • pass-door friend idiom
    • key-door friend idiom
    • partial-friend idiom
    • restricted-friend idiom

    I moved away from the key-lock/key-keyhole naming scheme to the pass naming scheme, which grew on me.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Trying to parse some XML but apparently this is too much for a lazy
I've got this code that works: def testTypeSpecialization: String = { class Foo[T] def
Apparently this used to work on ruby 1.8.7 but unfortunately not on 1.9.2 class
Apparently this is very basic jQuery but im on a time crunch and I
This is my question and apparently this is the answer . Turns out it
I see the CSC task in NAnt has a nowarn attribute, but apparently this
C++98 apparently has this as one of the standards for compilation phases. What does
I'm being passed an object that returns System.Byte[*] when converted to string. This apparently
Apparently, this does not work. WHY ??????? I don't want to do all this
This is a bit like this: Neo4j OutOfMemory problem But it's outdated and apparently

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.