Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 3873314
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 19, 20262026-05-19T22:01:20+00:00 2026-05-19T22:01:20+00:00

Apple recommends to declare a BOOL property this way: @property (nonatomic, assign, getter=isWorking) BOOL

  • 0

Apple recommends to declare a BOOL property this way:

@property (nonatomic, assign, getter=isWorking) BOOL working;

As I’m using Objective-C 2.0 properties and dot notation, I access this property using self.working. I know that I could also use [self isWorking] — but I don’t have to.

So, as I’m using dot notation everywhere, why should I define an extra property? Would it be okay to simply write

@property (nonatomic, assign) BOOL working;

Or do I have any benefits writing getter=isWorking in my case (usage of dot notation)?

Thanks!

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-19T22:01:21+00:00Added an answer on May 19, 2026 at 10:01 pm

    Apple simply recommends declaring an isX getter for stylistic purposes. It doesn’t matter whether you customize the getter name or not, as long as you use the dot notation or message notation with the correct name. If you’re going to use the dot notation it makes no difference, you still access it by the property name:

    @property (nonatomic, assign) BOOL working;
    
    [self setWorking:YES];         // Or self.working = YES;
    BOOL working = [self working]; // Or = self.working;
    

    Or

    @property (nonatomic, assign, getter=isWorking) BOOL working;
    
    [self setWorking:YES];           // Or self.working = YES;, same as above
    BOOL working = [self isWorking]; // Or = self.working;, also same as above
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Apple recommends dismissing any UIAlertViews/UIActionSheets when entering background state in iOS 4. This is
Apple strongly recommends using the binary plist format when reading large XML-based data sets
-(id) init { // always call super init // Apple recommends to re-assign self
I've implemented a UITabBar programmatically exactly the way Apple recommends, and I can't get
Is there a way to select all elements that have a given style using
Apple, for memory management issues, recommend defining outlets on properties, not in the attribute
From what I've read elsewhere, Apple recommends multiple versions of every graphical asset, so
The app I'm working on was recently rejected by Apple for containing an auto-renewable
In Apple documentation you can find that Apple recommends to release heavy data like
I know that Apple officially recommends UIKit to be used in the main thread

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.