Are machine word size (or smaller) writes serialized? Only one native opcode is needed to copy register content to RAM.
Are machine word size (or smaller) writes serialized? Only one native opcode is needed
Share
Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.
Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.
Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
Are machine word size (or smaller) writes serialized? Only one native opcode is needed to copy register content to RAM.
Writing data to RAM is atomic. If two CPUs try to write to the same location at the same time, the memory controller will decide on some order for the writes. While one CPU is writing to memory, the other CPU will stall for as many cycles as necessary until the first write is completed; then it will overwrite its value. This is what’s known as a race condition.
Writes that are smaller than the native word size are not atomic — in that case, the CPU must read the old memory value into a register, write the new bytes into the register, and then write that new value back to memory.
You should never have code that depends on this — if you have multiple CPUs that are trying to simultaneously write to the same memory location, you’re doing something wrong.
Another important consideration is the cache coherency problem. Each CPU has its own cache. If a CPU writes data to its cache, the other CPUs need to be made aware of the change to that data value if they want to read it.