Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7734931
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 1, 20262026-06-01T07:22:26+00:00 2026-06-01T07:22:26+00:00

Are parallel collections intended to do operations with side effects? If so, how can

  • 0

Are parallel collections intended to do operations with side effects? If so, how can you avoid race conditions?
For example:

var sum=0
(1 to 10000).foreach(n=>sum+=n); println(sum)

50005000

no problem with this.
But if try to parallelize, race conditions happen:

var sum=0
(1 to 10000).par.foreach(n=>sum+=n);println(sum)

49980037
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-01T07:22:28+00:00Added an answer on June 1, 2026 at 7:22 am

    Quick answer: don’t do that. Parallel code should be parallel, not concurrent.

    Better answer:

    val sum = (1 to 10000).par.reduce(_+_) // depends on commutativity and associativity
    

    See also aggregate.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

When I use Parallel.ForEach or Parallel.For in the System.Threading.Tasks namespace, can I assume that
Say I have 2 parallel collections, eg: a list of people's names in a
I've been looking at the new Scala 2.9 parallel collections and am hoping to
according to the official docs there are two options to create parallel collections: 1)
I have a Parallel.ForEach loop running an intensive operation inside the body. The operation
I am trying to parallel a classic map-reduce problem (which can parallel well with
I would like to use the new Parallel.ForEach function to loop through a datatable
I'm having a little trouble figuring out how to call the Parallel.ForEach with a
How can I use the parallel ParHashMap.map to when I want to apply a
Scala 2.9 introduced parallel collections. They are a really great tool for certain tasks.

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.