Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 630123
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 13, 20262026-05-13T19:49:17+00:00 2026-05-13T19:49:17+00:00

Are there any built it options for arrays supporting more than 2^31 keys. This

  • 0

Are there any built it options for arrays supporting more than 2^31 keys. This would make keys of type System.Int64 rather than System.Int. While 2^31 is a fair amount, there are a growing number of of applications where more keys would help. For instance, there are over 3 billion base pairs in the human genome. Any easy options?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-13T19:49:18+00:00Added an answer on May 13, 2026 at 7:49 pm

    It’s not possible in .NET because there is a maximum limit of 2GB per object. Even in 64-bit, you still have this limit.

    If you really want to try to keep all this data in memory at once, you could partition your data into chunks. You can even write a wrapper class to transparently map the index from an Int64 to an Int32 index on the correct partition.

    You could read this article about BigArray.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Is there any debugging options built-in in the Xlib (libX11.so)? Can I get list
Is there any built-in methods that are part of lists that would give me
Is there any built-in functionality for classical set operations on the java.util.Collection class? My
Are there any built-in C# data structures that are like a hash table but
Is there any built-in utility or helper to parse HttpContext.Current.User.Identity.Name , e.g. domain\user to
Are there any built-in functions in .Net that allow to capitalize strings, or handling
Is there any built-in, add-in solution for visual studio to compare two files and
Is there any built-in support for that? And if not, is there any consensus
Is there any built in functionality that enables downloading files from FTP in .NET?
Are there any built in paging functions for IEnumberable (or a better library to

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.