Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8778711
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 13, 20262026-06-13T19:35:48+00:00 2026-06-13T19:35:48+00:00

Are there any differences in execution time between constructors and initialization lists?(or is it

  • 0

Are there any differences in execution time between constructors and initialization lists?(or is it just a matter of coding preference).
I have a set of objects that needs to be created frequently and would like to know if there is any performance gain by using initialization lists instead of constructors.

If I were to create a million instances of class A and another million of class B which choice would be better(the objects represent packets generated within a network hence these numbers).

 class A {
   private:
     int a, b;

   public:
     A(int a_var, int b_var):a(a_var), b(b_var) {}; 
 };

 class B {
   private:
     int a, b;

   public:
     B(int a_var, int b_var) {
        a = a_var;
        b = b_var;
     }
};

If any of the constructors is faster than the other for primitive types(as in the example) will it be faster if a and b were to be replaced by types?

Type example:

 class AType {
   private:
     string a, b;

   public:
     AType(string a_var, string b_var):a(a_var), b(b_var) {}; 
};
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-13T19:35:49+00:00Added an answer on June 13, 2026 at 7:35 pm

    The difference is for types with no trivial default constructor, which is called for you by compiler in your class B. Your class B is equivalent to:

     class B {
       private:
         SleepyInt a, b;
    
       public:
         // takes at least 20s
         B(int a_var, int b_var) : a(), b()
         //                      ^^^^^^^^^^ 
         {
            a = a_var;
            b = b_var;
         }
      };
    

    If you do not place member variable or base class constructor in initialization list – ithe default constructor is called for them. int is basic type – its default constructor costs nothing – so no difference in your example, but for more complex types constructor+assignment might cost more than just constructing.

    Some funny example, just to illustrate the difference:

    class SleepyInt {
    public:
      SleepyInt () { 
        std::this_thread::sleep_for(std::chrono::milliseconds( 10000 ));  
      }
      SleepyInt (int i) {}
      SleepyInt & operator = (int i) { return *this; }
    };
    
    class A {
       private:
         SleepyInt a, b;
    
       public:
         A(int a_var, int b_var):a(a_var), b(b_var) {}; 
     };
    
     class B {
       private:
         SleepyInt a, b;
    
       public:
         // takes at least 20s
         B(int a_var, int b_var) {
            a = a_var;
            b = b_var;
         }
    };
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Is there any difference in efficiency (e.g. execution time, code size, etc.) between these
Are there any differences between LEA $1000,A0 and MOVE #$1000,A0 to put an address
Are there any differences in functionality between these two JavaScript module patterns? var MODULE
Are there any differences when it comes to performance between the following three border
Is there any differences between : > file and > file ? $ :
Are there any differences between get_object_vars($obj) and (array) $obj ? Both seem to return
There are any differences between using SetValue with (for example) Canvas.LeftProperty and Margin Property?
Is there any performance differences between string.Format and String.Format ? As far as i
I have a huge difference of time execution between a 1-minute query and the
Are there any differences using <!--[if lt IE 7]>...<![endif]--> or <!--[if lte IE 6]>...<![endif]-->

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.