Are there any performance benefits to me not using the gridview in asp.net for simple tables querying from a stored procedure and instead writing the html in server code myself. I’m sure my code would certainly be more concise in output.
Share
Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.
Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.
Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
Are there any performance benefits to me not using the gridview in asp.net for simple tables querying from a stored procedure and instead writing the html in server code myself. I’m sure my code would certainly be more concise in output.
I am going to propose an alternate solution. If you don’t need any of the features of a GridView, why not use a repeater.
A repeater keeps it simple for implementation, but also allows you to have full control over the generated source. Without the issue of string concatentation preformance.
I’ve found marginal performance improvements with repeaters over GridViews.