Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6557623
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 25, 20262026-05-25T13:05:50+00:00 2026-05-25T13:05:50+00:00

Are there ever any performance (speed & memory) benefits to using a properly-implemented singleton

  • 0

Are there ever any performance (speed & memory) benefits to using a properly-implemented singleton object vs. caching a single object and fetching it out of cache as it is needed?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-25T13:05:50+00:00Added an answer on May 25, 2026 at 1:05 pm

    There isn’t any difference, not only performance, but also logical. A singleton “caches” its instance in its own static field, so it’s logically a cache as well.

    And your cache should have a singleton-preserving-logic, which most caches don’t have.

    Distributed scenarios are a different story, but in that case you should have the data cached, rather than an instance.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Has anybody here ever used ngen? Where? why? Was there any performance improvement? when
Have you ever seen any of there error messages? -- SQL Server 2000 Could
Are there any performance benchmarks for Mono compared to say Java in GNU/Linux? Have
For an ASP.NET Literal control, is there ever any reason to use LiteralMode.PassThrough instead
Possible Duplicate: Is there ever a time where using a database 1:1 relationship makes
Is there ever a circumstance in which I would not want to use the
Is there ever a good reason to not declare a virtual destructor for a
Is there ever a reason to use Type parameters over generics, ie: // this...
Is there ever reason to think the >> (signed) and >>> (unsigned) right bit-shift
Is there ever a circumstance where the .MYI files should be bigger than my

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.