Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8064555
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 5, 20262026-06-05T11:24:12+00:00 2026-06-05T11:24:12+00:00

Are there SSE instructions that could replace part or whole algorithm written below. There

  • 0

Are there SSE instructions that could replace part or whole algorithm written below.

There is very long array of short values (byte, or long are acceptable). A value that is greater than some threshold must be found.

Thank you.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-05T11:24:14+00:00Added an answer on June 5, 2026 at 11:24 am

    Yes, you can just do the following (pseudo code):

    Init threshold vector
    Found = FALSE
    For each vector of N elements
        Load vector (_mm_load_si128)
        Compare greater than threshold (_mm_cmpgt_XXX)
        Move comparison vector to mask (_mm_movemask_epi8)
        If mask != 0
            Found = TRUE
            Break
        End
    End
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Following my previous question (I assume that 64-bit compiler uses only SSE instructions for
Is there any SSE instruction (up to version 4.2) that automatically fills four XMM
This is a somewhat low-level question. In x86 assembly there are two SSE instructions:
There are some stdlib functions that throw errors on invalid input. For example: Prelude>
There is my code that I want to alert test once when mousemove ,
There are two ways that I know that you can fetch results in Rails
There are posts that touch on this question, but no one that I can
Is there any difference between logical SSE intrinsics for different types? For example if
I'm very new to SIMD/SSE and I'm trying to do some simple image filtering
I'm trying to optimize a cube function using SSE long cube(long n) { return

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.