Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 3239368
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 17, 20262026-05-17T17:57:43+00:00 2026-05-17T17:57:43+00:00

As a budding web developer I’m trying to walk the fine line of cross-platform

  • 0

As a budding web developer I’m trying to walk the fine line of cross-platform usability/compatibility and pizazz(functionality).

Is this as much of a problem as it was a few years ago? The parts of my site that – dare I say – require (aka make my life easier) JavaScript would not be something that a mobile would want to access (although it could if it wanted to).

http://www.w3schools.com/browsers/browsers_stats.asp

If you scroll down, it seems to indicate that 95% of computers accessing that site have JavaScript enabled/installed.

Any input from someone who has dealt with this issue would be appreciated.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-17T17:57:43+00:00Added an answer on May 17, 2026 at 5:57 pm

    I don’t know anyone these days who has Javascript turned off permanently. The sheer amount of sites that rely on JS means that the web is virtually unusable without it.

    The vast majority of people simply leave it on all the time. Most of the really serious security holes that used to make people turn it off have long since been fixed, so it’s much less of an issue than it used to be.

    There are still some things that worry the paranoid, but even then most people who do disable JS do so on a site-by-site basis using a tool like the Firefox NoScript extension rather than just switching it off. When these people visit a new site, they have to decide whether they trust it enough to enable JS for it.

    The other demographic which may be affected is disabled users, using a screen reader or other assistive technology. Many of these people may not be able to use Javascript. (that said though, many of them can; screen readers are not nearly as backward compared with regular browsers as many people imagine)

    As the end of the day though, it’s up to you really to decide what to do about supporting your visitors who don’t have JS. Here are some things to consider:

    • Does your site absolutely require Javacript – If you’re writing a GMail type system, and the whole thing only works because of JS, then obviously you can’t support not having it.
    • How much of your audience will have JS disabled? How many of them will be prepared to re-enable it just to visit your site? How many of those people are you prepared to lose? You’ll need to know your own demographic before you can answer that.
    • Can you write the JS features such that the site still works sufficiently without them? Users with JS turned off will expect sites they visit not to look great and having missing functionality, but they’ll be happy as long as the important bits still work for them.
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Some context: This pertains to my budding desire to build multilayer web applications with:
Im a budding iphone developer, and doing my best but i have a query
I have sat for quite some time trying to work this out and just
I'm writing a mobile web application using JQuery Mobile, JQuery, Javascript. This is my
I have a budding developer who is very enthusiastic about something he is calling
I am trying to Add a CronTabs in a site{bidding site}, where the aspect
I just have a quick question about the conditional operator. Still a budding programmer
Apple is always in the news these days with i this and i that.
I'm developing an application in java which can take textual information from different web
I have no idea how to search for this one and perhaps Serverfault would

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.