Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 46117
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 10, 20262026-05-10T15:54:57+00:00 2026-05-10T15:54:57+00:00

As a temporary quick fix to mitigate the major risk while working on the

  • 0

As a temporary quick fix to mitigate the major risk while working on the permanent fix for XSS Vulnerability in a very large code base, I’m looking for a pre-existing XSS prevention blacklist that does a reasonable job of protecting against XSS.

Preferably a set of Regular Expressions. I’m aware of plenty of cheat sheets for testing and smoke tests etc, what I’m looking for is pre-tuned regexps for blocking the attacks.

I am fully aware that the best way is output escaping or if you need some markup from users to use whitelisting. But, with the size of the code base, we need something in quick to reduce the immediate footprint of the vulnerability and raise the bar whilst working on the real solution.

Is anyone aware of a good set?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. 2026-05-10T15:54:57+00:00Added an answer on May 10, 2026 at 3:54 pm

    I realise this may not be a direct answer to your question, but ASP.NET developers in a similar situation may find this useful:

    Microsoft Anti-Cross Site Scripting Library V1.5

    This library differs from most encoding libraries in that it uses the ‘principle of inclusions’ technique to provide protection against XSS attacks. This approach works by first defining a valid or allowable set of characters, and encodes anything outside this set (invalid characters or potential attacks). The principle of inclusions approach provides a high degree of protection against XSS attacks and is suitable for Web applications with high security requirements.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 106k
  • Answers 106k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer You can do it using P/Invoke: [DllImport("user32.dll")] static extern int… May 11, 2026 at 8:54 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Dispose is never called automatically. The connection will not be… May 11, 2026 at 8:54 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer This could be against Google's standards and could result in… May 11, 2026 at 8:54 pm

Related Questions

On all my Windows servers, except for one machine, when I execute the following
This is kinda weird. I have the next query: SELECT * , GROUP_CONCAT( x.tag
The question was about plain c functions, not c++ static methods, as clarified in
Like many of you, I have to deal with a large amount of files:

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.