Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 3324344
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 17, 20262026-05-17T23:24:37+00:00 2026-05-17T23:24:37+00:00

As an addition to my current application, I need to create a separate thread

  • 0

As an addition to my current application, I need to create a separate thread which will periodically do some processing

I’ve create a new class to do all this, and this class will be loaded on startup of my application.

This is what I have so far :

public class PeriodicChecker extends Thread
{
    static
    {
        Thread t = new Thread(new PeriodicChecker());
        while(true)
        {
            t.run();
            try
            {
                Thread.sleep(5000l);
            }
            catch (InterruptedException e)
            {
                e.printStackTrace();
            }
        }
    }

    /**
     * Private constructor to prevent instantiation
     */
    private PeriodicChecker()
    {

    }

    @Override
    public void run()
    {
        System.out.println("Thread is doing something");
        // Actual business logic here, that is repeated
    }

}

I want to make constructor private to prevent other people from attempting to instantiate this class accidentally. How can I achieve this?

Also, is there anything bad about my implementation of such requirements? I’m only creating one thread which will run then sleep, have I missed anything obvious? I haven’t worked with threads before

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-17T23:24:37+00:00Added an answer on May 17, 2026 at 11:24 pm

    You have some conceptual erros in your code… for example:

    • You should call start() and not run(), because you are running the method sequentially and not simultaneously.
    • You can call start() only once, not once in each loop iteration. After that, the thread is in state TERMINATED, you should create a new thread to run it again
    • You should not create the thread in the static block, it is a bad practice, and maybe the Thread is running before you want it to run.

    You should read some examples about thread, it is a little difficult to unserstand at the beginning, and you can have undesired effects very easily.

    Here is a little example, that may do something similar to that you want:

    public class PeriodicChecker extends Thread
    {
        @Override
        public void run()
        {
            while(true) {
               System.out.println("Thread is doing something");
               Thread.sleep(5000);
            }
        }
    
    }
    
    public OtherClass {
       public static void main(String args[]) {
          Thread t = new PeriodicChecker();
          t.start();
       }
    }
    

    If you want that none can create a new Thread, you could create a singleton, so you will be sure that none is creating more threads.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have a relatively simple goal: I want to create a Cocoa application which
I'm writing an application that indexes data for our stores, some of which are
If UNION ALL is an addition in T-SQL. What is the equivalent of subtraction?
I have a C# WCF REST Service which allows the addition of a bookmark,
I'm creating a web application that will involve habitual file uploading and retrieval (PDFs,
Is there an easy way to create a cross platform portable Xulrunner application? By
In addition, are there any performance advantages to static methods over instance methods? I
In addition to informing the user, we want to collect information for our debugging
As an addition to my previous post on Creating a web server in pure
I am doing .net programming in addition to c and c++ development and want

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.