Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 45053
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 10, 20262026-05-10T15:44:55+00:00 2026-05-10T15:44:55+00:00

As an exercise for myself, I was translating a sample program into various languages.

  • 0

As an exercise for myself, I was translating a sample program into various languages. Starting in C#, I had a visitor-pattern interface like so:

interface Visitor     {         void Accept(Bedroom x);         void Accept(Bathroom x);         void Accept(Kitchen x);         void Accept(LivingRoom x);     } 

Moving to ruby (or python, or whatever), I no longer get dispatch from the compiler based on type. Should I do the dispatch in the visitor itself?

class Cleaner    def accept(x)     acceptBedroom(x) if Bedroom === x     acceptBathroom(x) if Bathroom === x     acceptKitchen(x) if Kitchen===x     acceptLivingRoom(x) if LivingRoom===x   end    ... 

Or should I do the dispatch in the different specializaions of the room:

class Bathroom<Room   def initialize(name)     super(name)   end   def accept(visitor)     visitor.acceptBathroom(self)   end end 

Or is there another preferred idiom that is used in dynamic languages?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. 2026-05-10T15:44:56+00:00Added an answer on May 10, 2026 at 3:44 pm

    My recommendation is to use the former approach. There are pluses and minuses for each approach. The former is harder to maintain as the number of Room types grows; the latter is harder as the number of Cleaner types grows.

    In Ruby, you could try

    def accept(x)   send 'accept#{x.class}'.to_sym, x end 

    PS: not all dynamically typed languages are unable to do dispatch based on type; some can infer type, or failing that, can used forced casting to pick the proper method among the overloaded options.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 117k
  • Answers 118k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer class Program { static void Main(string[] args) { Timer timer… May 11, 2026 at 10:50 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Use GROUP_CONCAT SELECT GROUP_CONCAT(bar) FROM TABLE GROUP BY foo; May 11, 2026 at 10:50 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Your code doesn't work because the function is not returning… May 11, 2026 at 10:50 pm

Related Questions

I'm writing a utility for myself, partly as an exercise in learning C# Reflection
The median of five is sometimes used as an exercise in algorithm design and
I'm a relative newbie to thinking in OOP terms, and haven't yet found my
I'm a beginner (self-learning) programmer learning C++, and recently I decided to implement a

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.