Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 781757
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 14, 20262026-05-14T20:16:54+00:00 2026-05-14T20:16:54+00:00

As detailed elsewhere , and otherwise apparently well-known, Internet Explorer (definitely version 7, and

  • 0

As detailed elsewhere, and otherwise apparently well-known, Internet Explorer (definitely version 7, and in some instances, version 8) do not implement key functions, in particular on Array (such as forEach, indexOf, etc).

There are a number of workarounds here and there, but I’d like to fold a proper, canonical set of implementations into our site rather than copy and paste or hack away at our own implementations. I’ve found js-methods, which looks promising, but thought I’d post here to see whether another library comes more highly-recommended. A couple of miscellaneous criteria:

  • The library should just be a no-operation for those functions that a browser already has implementations for (js-methods appears to do quite well here).
  • Non-GPL, please, though LGPL is acceptable.
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-14T20:16:55+00:00Added an answer on May 14, 2026 at 8:16 pm

    Many use the MDC fallback implementations (eg. for indexOf). They’re generally rigorously standards-compliant, even to the extent of explicitly checking the types of all the arguments.

    Unfortunately whilst it is clear that the authors regard this code as trivial and freely-usable, there doesn’t seem to be an explicit licence-grant to put this in writing. The wiki as a whole is CC Attribution-ShareAlike, if that’s an acceptable licence (though CC isn’t designed for code as such).

    js-methods looks OK in general, but is not as standards-compliant around the edges of how the functions are supposed to be (eg. undefined list items, functions that mutate the list). It’s also full of other random non-standard methods, including some questionable ones like the dodgy stripTags and the incomplete UTF-8 codec (which is also a bit unnecessary given the unescape(encodeURIComponent) trick).

    For what it’s worth, here’s what I use (which I hereby release into the public domain, if it can be said to be copyrightable at all). It’s a bit shorter than the MDC versions as it doesn’t attempt to type-sniff that you haven’t done something silly like pass non-function callbacks or non-integer indexes, but apart from that it attempts to be standards-compliant. (Let me know if I’ve missed anything. ;-))

    'use strict';
    
    // Add ECMA262-5 method binding if not supported natively
    //
    if (!('bind' in Function.prototype)) {
        Function.prototype.bind= function(owner) {
            var that= this;
            if (arguments.length<=1) {
                return function() {
                    return that.apply(owner, arguments);
                };
            } else {
                var args= Array.prototype.slice.call(arguments, 1);
                return function() {
                    return that.apply(owner, arguments.length===0? args : args.concat(Array.prototype.slice.call(arguments)));
                };
            }
        };
    }
    
    // Add ECMA262-5 string trim if not supported natively
    //
    if (!('trim' in String.prototype)) {
        String.prototype.trim= function() {
            return this.replace(/^\s+/, '').replace(/\s+$/, '');
        };
    }
    
    // Add ECMA262-5 Array methods if not supported natively
    //
    if (!('indexOf' in Array.prototype)) {
        Array.prototype.indexOf= function(find, i /*opt*/) {
            if (i===undefined) i= 0;
            if (i<0) i+= this.length;
            if (i<0) i= 0;
            for (var n= this.length; i<n; i++)
                if (i in this && this[i]===find)
                    return i;
            return -1;
        };
    }
    if (!('lastIndexOf' in Array.prototype)) {
        Array.prototype.lastIndexOf= function(find, i /*opt*/) {
            if (i===undefined) i= this.length-1;
            if (i<0) i+= this.length;
            if (i>this.length-1) i= this.length-1;
            for (i++; i-->0;) /* i++ because from-argument is sadly inclusive */
                if (i in this && this[i]===find)
                    return i;
            return -1;
        };
    }
    if (!('forEach' in Array.prototype)) {
        Array.prototype.forEach= function(action, that /*opt*/) {
            for (var i= 0, n= this.length; i<n; i++)
                if (i in this)
                    action.call(that, this[i], i, this);
        };
    }
    if (!('map' in Array.prototype)) {
        Array.prototype.map= function(mapper, that /*opt*/) {
            var other= new Array(this.length);
            for (var i= 0, n= this.length; i<n; i++)
                if (i in this)
                    other[i]= mapper.call(that, this[i], i, this);
            return other;
        };
    }
    if (!('filter' in Array.prototype)) {
        Array.prototype.filter= function(filter, that /*opt*/) {
            var other= [], v;
            for (var i=0, n= this.length; i<n; i++)
                if (i in this && filter.call(that, v= this[i], i, this))
                    other.push(v);
            return other;
        };
    }
    if (!('every' in Array.prototype)) {
        Array.prototype.every= function(tester, that /*opt*/) {
            for (var i= 0, n= this.length; i<n; i++)
                if (i in this && !tester.call(that, this[i], i, this))
                    return false;
            return true;
        };
    }
    if (!('some' in Array.prototype)) {
        Array.prototype.some= function(tester, that /*opt*/) {
            for (var i= 0, n= this.length; i<n; i++)
                if (i in this && tester.call(that, this[i], i, this))
                    return true;
            return false;
        };
    }
    

    Other ECMA262-5 methods not implemented here include Array reduce/reduceRight, the JSON ones and the few new Object methods that can be reliably implemented as JS functions.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Is there a detailed guide which explains how to host a website on your
The cvsnt manual provides a detailed list of parameters than can be passed to
I'm using the AcceptVerbs method detailed in Scott Gu's Preview 5 blog post for
I have a bowling web application that allows pretty detailed frame-by-frame information entry. One
Is anyone aware of a good resource online for detailed information on the use
After user places an order I have to send detailed email message containing order
The ASP.NET team released the script combining feature in 3.5 SP1 as detailed here
I was wondering what the general consensus on error messages was. How detailed should
It should be hands-on, complete, targeted to programmers and detailed on layout techniques!

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.